Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD HAFEEZ versus THE MANAGING DIRECTOR KARACHI TRANSPORT CORPORATION

West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance Section 2, 9 and 12 of the Industrial Relations Ordinance (XXIII of 1969), Section 25A (4) of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 of the Industrial Dispute Service Labor Appellate Tribunal. Under the definition of section 2 (i) of Ordinance VI of the end 1968, neither the employees nor the applicants of the Karachi Transport Corporation were actually employees of the Sindh Road Transport Corporation but after the incorporation of the Karachi Transport Corporation, they were later transferred to the Karachi Transport Corporation. Taken on the power of The services of employees terminated by Sindh Road Transport Corporation and Karachi Transport Corporation are also not retained in their services, though their services have not been terminated by the Karachi Transport Corporation, which is completely under the control of Karachi Transport Corporation. Evidence includes complete list of employees of Sindh Road Transport Corporation. Crook High Transport Corporation was not presented to Labor Court employees, although they are not laborers in the sense of section 2 (i) of the Ordinance 19, yet their claim cannot be predicted. Employed by Karachi Transport Corporation by tribunal decision. Open for them to plead in legal proceedings that they were employees of Karachi Transport Corporation and they can produce evidence and the decision of the Labor Appellate Tribunal will not go their way. how to become a advocate from Mohen Jo Daro lawyer