SYED MOHSIN ALI HASANI versus SECRETARY, ESTABLISHMENT DIVISION
Under the Service Tribunals Act 1973 Section 4 Appellant, an Assistant Professor of Educational Institution under the Government of the Punjab who chooses to serve the Federal Government while handling such institutions by the Federal Government, such powers are deemed final, the Federal Government. Or the question of the provincial government did not arise to send any person back to the homeland, after the appellant's scope to serve the federal government with the federal government for any period, the Punjab government in the case of the appellant. The use of the Promotion Order cannot be allowed. Therefore, it is considered ineligible once it was approved by the Central Selection Board and given the necessary financial benefits for the tenure of acting against this high position, therefore, the ineligible applicant cannot be considered. No one can be entitled to a deposit with the federal government or with a parent, however, because the public appellant is entitled to higher salaries because of working against a higher office, for which he should receive full financial benefits under the current rules.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
best advocate from Mardan lawyer