Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

G. AHMED versus GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN


Government Employees (Talent and Discipline) Rules 1973 R 5 Disciplinary Procedure Inquiry Procedure The competent officer fails to test the attractiveness of the condition and is unable to take the appropriate course of action No trial was made with reasonable punishment Answer The plaintiffs have failed to convince the Tribunal on all three matters, namely the lack of a copy of the inquiry report, non-submission of appropriate show cause notices, and such actions as requested by the appellant if it did not support private hearing opportunities, In any case, such facts cannot be ignored Provided the Tribunal with a very skeptical view of the conduct and conduct of the retaliation case, the appeal was legally accepted as well as the facts and merits and the invalid order benefited from all consequences. went.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
advocate for immigration from Guddu lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.