ISHTIAQ AHMAD versus THE GENERAL MANAGER, PAKISTAN RAILWAYS
Appointment of Section 4 Appellant's salary of the Service Tribunals Act 1973, a former Indian Railway officer where he worked as a cash clerk, was transferred to Pakistan under the International Domination Agreement, and the Railway Department Food was posted as a cash clerk, but upon his termination, the appellant, unlike other academics who received more work and were absorbed as clerks, was posted as a number talker. This post was less than a clerk on the pay scale that would allow all such former Indian Railway employees to be re-assigned to the salary. Except for appellant wef 12 = 10 1953, who was acting as clerk on that day, appellant was allowed seniority as clerk even though he was not treated as such on 12 12 1949. There was no justification for doing so, though he was working as a number at the time. Taker, and allowed the appeal to allow him to take advantage of salary reform, placed the defective order aside and allowed to appeal to take advantage of salary reform.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
how to become a advocate from Daharki lawyer