Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

ASGHAR ALI versus STATE


Criminal Code of Conduct (CCPC) Sections 520 and 561A of the West Pakistan Arms Ordinance (XX of 1965), decision of section 13, the modification of the robber in the applicant's house and his domestic articles in addition to the accused are also licensed. The accused, who was stripped of the rifle, was arrested and the rifle was recovered from him, but police registered another case against the accused under section 13, the weapons ordinance trial magistrate acquitted the accused under section 13, the arms ordinance. And confiscated the controversial rifle and ordered it to be confiscated in a state dispute whether the applicant is a licensee or owner. From the controversial rifle, it could not be confiscated and should have been handed over to him; it was the correct order under which the trial magistrate was amended and the trial court directed that the robbery case. In, the disputed rifle should be delivered to the applicant on superstition.

1987 P Cr. L J 1544

[Lahore]

Before Rustam S. Sidhwa, J

Rana ASHGAR ALI‑‑Petitioner

versus

THE STATE‑‑Respondent

Criminal Miscellaneous No. 834/M of 1986, decided on 12th January, 1987.

Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)‑‑

‑‑‑Ss. 520 & 561‑A‑‑West Pakistan Arms Ordinance (XX of 1965), S. 13‑ Judgment, modification of ‑‑Dacoity committed in petitioner's house and accused besides their household articles took away his licensed rifle‑ Accused arrested and disputed rifle recovered from him, police, however, registered yet another case against accused under S. 13, Arms Ordinance‑ Trial Magistrate acquitted accused under S. 13, Arms Ordinance and confiscated disputed rifle and ordered same to be forfeited to State‑ Contention that petitioner being licensee/owner of disputed rifle, it could not be confiscated and should have been delivered to him, held, was correct‑‑Order of trial Magistrate modified and Trial Court directed to deliver disputed rifle to petitioner on Supardari, in dacoity case.

Malik Muhammad Ashhab for Petitioner.

Zulfiqar Haider for the State.

Date of hearing: 12th January, 1987.

JUDGMENT

This is a petition under sections 520 and 561‑A, Cr.P.C. by Rana Asghar Ali, petitioner, for modification of the order passed by the Magistrate Ist Class, Ferozewala, dated 31‑6‑1984 confiscating the disputed rifle and ordering the same to be forfeited to the State.

2. The brief facts of the case are that on 13‑3‑1987 a dacoity took place in the house of Rana Asghar Ali, petitioner. Alongwith the other household articles the dacoits took away the licensed .22 bore rifle No. 78697 (non prohibited) belonging to the petitioner. A case regarding this dacoity was registered by the petitioner at Police Station Ferozewala vide F.I.R. No. 56 on 16‑3‑1981 under section 14/17 of the Hudood Ordinance VI of 1979. Subsequently on 24‑1‑1982 two culprits, namely, Haider alias Bashir and Muhammad Nawaz were arrested by the police, who were duly identified by the petitioner and the other inmates of the house. Apart from one Chaddar, the above mentioned rifle was recovered from Haider alias Bashir, accused, in respect of which a separate case under section 13 of the Arms Ordinance was registered against the said accused at Police Station Ferozewala vide F.I.R. No. 17 lodged on 24‑1‑1982. Haider, accused, was acquitted by Mr. Munawwar Hussain Cheema, M.I.C., Ferozewala, on 31‑ 7‑ 1984 in the case against him under the Arms Ordinance. The petitioner's rifle, which was recovered from Haider, accused, was ordered to be confiscated to the State. Through the present petition the petitioner desires that the disputed rifle be ordered to be delivered to him, as he is the licence‑owner of the same.

3. I have heard the arguments of the learned counsel for the petitioner and the State and have perused the trial Court file regarding the case against Haider, accused under the Arms Ordinance. It appears that the said rifle was sent to the Forensic Science Laboratory for examination. The report of the Director, Forensic Science Laboratory, dated 5‑4‑1982, which has been placed on the record, shows that the number of the rifle had been erased away, but that laboratory test had revealed that the original number of the same was '78697'. The petitioner has placed on record the photostat copy of his arms licence, which shows that he is the licencee/owner of the said rifle No. 78697. The learned counsel for the State has no objection to the said rifle being delivered into the custody of the petitioner, subject, however, to the delivery being given to the petitioner presently on Sapurdari, as the case against Haider and Muhammad Nawaz, accused, under section 14/ 17 of the Hudood Ordinance VI of 1979 is still pending. In this view of the matter, the petitioner has made out a case for the delivery of the said rifle to him.

4. For the foregoing reasons, this petition is accepted and the order of Mr. Munawwar Hussain Cheema, M.I.C., Ferozewala, dated 31‑7‑1984 passed in the case titled State v. Haider under section 13 of the Arms Ordinance, is modified to the extent that rifle No. 78697 shall be delivered to Rana Asghar Ali, petitioner, on Sapurdari in case F.I.R. No. 56 of 1981 registered at Police Station, Ferozewala by the learned Sessions Judge, Sheikhupura. who is presently trying that case. The learned Sessions Judge, Sheikhupura, shall be entitled to take such security from the petitioner as he may deem fit and reasonable in the said connection.

S.G.D./A‑40/L Order accordingly.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
best law firms from Loralai lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.