Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

NAZAR HUSSAIN GULL versus STATE


Criminal Code of Criminal Procedure (CCPC) Section 497 Penal Code (XLV of 1860) Sections 463 and 464 are present in the court and states that the parties have been compromised and that they are trying to prosecute the accused bail. Does not want to Accused under the circumstances

1987 P Cr. LJ 1458

[Lahore]

Before Ijaz Nisar, J

NAZAR HUSSAIN GULL‑‑Petitioner

versus

THE STATE‑‑Respondent

Criminal Miscellaneous No. 3272/B of 1986, decided on 17th September, 1986.

Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)‑‑

‑‑‑S. 497‑‑Penal Code (XLV of 1860) Ss. 463 & 464‑‑Bail‑‑Complainant present in Court and stating that compromise had been arrived at between parties and that he did not want to prosecute the case against accused‑ Bail granted to accused in circumstances.

Saleem Akhtar for Petitioner.

M. Sharif for the Complainant.

Malik M. Rashid Awan for the State.

JUDGMENT

The allegation against the petitioner is that he had forged a sale- deed of a house belonging to Mst. Safia, wife of Guffar Ahmad. During the pendency of the case, the petitioner was admitted to bail but later it was cancelled due to his non‑appearance. It is stated that his non- appearance was not wilful' but was due to misunderstanding caused by the compromise arrived at between the parties. Guffar Ahmad husband of Mst. Safia complainant is present in Court and states that a compromise has been arrived at between the parties and he does not want to prosecute the case against the petitioner. He states that he would be making a statement to this effect before the concerned Court.

In the above circumstances, I admit the petitioner to bail in the sum of Rs.10,000 with two sureties in the like amount to the satisfaction of Assistant Commissioner, Cantt. Lahore.

M.Y.H./N‑21/L Bail granted.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
law websites from Pind Dadan Khan lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.