Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

MUHAMMAD ASLAM versus STATE


Criminal Code of Conduct (CRPC) Section 497 Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Section 307/34 bail, defendant is allowed under conditions of bail to shoot the victim with gunshot wound to his victim.

1987 P Cr. L J 1451

[Lahore]

Before Mazhar‑ul‑Haq, J

MUHAMMAD ASLAM and another‑‑Petitioners

versus

THE STATE‑‑Respondent

Criminal Miscellaneous No. 741/13 of 1987, decided on 24th March, 1987.

Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)‑‑

‑‑‑S. 497‑‑Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S. 307/34‑‑Bail, grant of‑‑Accused firing with guns at their victim and injuring him‑‑Victim not suffering any bony injury‑‑Challan with prosecution branch even after about one year‑‑Bail allowed to accused in circumstances.

Syed Shakir Ali Rizvi for Petitioners.

Date of hearing: 24th March, 1987.

ORDER

Muhammad Aslam and Arshad petitioners are accused of having murderously assaulted Asif. The case was registered against them at Police Station Ferozewala on 9‑5‑1986.

2. Asif married Aslam petitioner's mother Mst. Mukhtar Begum. Later their relations became strained and she filed a suit for the dissolution of marriage which is pending thus petitioner bore a grudge against Asif and on the day of occurrence, Mansha took Asif to an open place where they started playing cards in the evening at about 6 p.m., just then, Aslam and his friend Arshad petitioners armed with .12 bore guns appeared there and fired at Asif as a result of which he suffered two injuries, one on the left fore‑arm and the other on the leg. In this firing, Mansha also suffered some injuries.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioners contended that it is almost a year now and the case is still with the prosecution branch. Further, contended that as borne out from the medical examination, the victim did not suffer any bony injury. In view of these circumstances and the fact that it is almost going to be a year now and the case has not gone to Court, petitioners are allowed bail in the sum of Rs.10,000 (Rupees ten thousand) each with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of A.C./Duty Magistrate, Ferozewala.

S.A./M‑132/L Bail allowed.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
advocate from Kashmir lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.