Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

NAUSHABAH TABASSAM versus GHULAM MADNI SHAH


Criminal Code of Conduct (CRPC) Section 491 detained minor juveniles from custody of their mother, who was confined to bed, the father of the children confessed that he was near her twenty days ago. Was taken while he was living with his mother for the last time. Six months and studying there, the father did not take the custody of the children through the litigation - custody of the child restored to the mother without prejudice to the father's right to transfer to Family Court

1987 P Cr. L J 1318

[Lahore]

Before Muhammad Rafique Tarar, J

Mst. NAUSHABAH TABASSAM‑‑Petitioner

versus

GHULAM MADNI SHAH‑‑Respondent

Criminal Miscellaneous No. 75/H of 1986, decided on 15th June, 1986.

Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)‑‑

‑‑S. 491‑‑Custody‑‑Minor girls taken away by father from custody of their mother who was confined to bed‑‑Father of children admitting that they were taken away by him about twenty days back while they were living with their mother for last six months and were studying there‑ Held, father had not taken custody' of children in lawful manner‑ Custody of children restored to mother without prejudice to right of father to move the Family Court.

Mst. Fakhrunnisa for Petitioner.

Detenu in Person.

Muhammad Zawar Shah for Respondent.

Date of hearing: 15th June, 1986.

ORDER

Mst. Naushabah Tabassum petitioner has moved this petition under section 491, Cr.P.C. praying that her minor daughters, namely, Kiran Hashmi and Nida Hashmi, who are being illegally detained by their father Ghulam Madni, be got recovered and their custody be handed over to her. Her case is that the respondent had been consistently maltreating her and in February, 1968 he turned her out when she was in family way and she started living in the house of her parents. The respondents got annoyed and took away both the minors, namely, Kiran Hashmi aged five years and Nida Hashmi aged four years, without her consent, when she was confined to bed due to the delivery of a child. On inquiry, the respondent states that he took away both the minors from the house of the petitioner about twenty days back and prior to that they were with their mother for six', months and were studying in Saint Joseph School. Prima facie, there is substance in the submission that the respondent had not taken the custody of the children in a lawful manner. In the circumstances, the custody of both the minors is handed over to the petitioner. This is, however, without prejudice to the rights of the parties to have resort to the Family Court for their custody.

M.Y.H./N‑20/L Petition allowed.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
registration advocate from Peshawar lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.