Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

FATEH SHER versus STATE


Criminal Code of Conduct (CCPC) Section 497 Bail, Sessions Judge's Grant Remaining Appeal for Bail Regardless of Matter of Qualification, In accordance with the law of prejudice without a prior order of the High Court. Directed to decide the case on merit.

1987 P Cr. L J 981

[Lahore]

Before Ghulam Mujaddid Mirza, C J

FATEH SHER‑‑Appellant

versus

THE STATE‑‑Respondent

Criminal Miscellaneous No.3425/ B of 1986, decided on 21st December, 1986.

Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)‑‑

‑‑‑S.497‑‑Bail, grant of‑‑Sessions Judge mechanically dismissing application for bail without considering case on merits‑‑Sessions Judge directed to decide case on merits in accordance with law without being prejudiced by previous order of the High Court.

Malik Abdus Sattar Chughtai for Petitioner.

Farooq Bedar, A.A.‑G. for the State.

Date of hearing: 21st December, 1986.

ORDER

The petitioner was admitted to pre‑arrest bail by the Additional Sessions Judge by order dated 28‑8‑1986. The bail was cancelled by me on an application moved by Mst. Nasreen Akhtar daughter of Alam Sher, resident of Thalla Noon, Tehsil and District Bhakkar, by order dated 27‑10‑1986. The petitioner was taken into custody.

2. Thereafter he applied for bail after arrest. The Additional Sessions Judge dismissed the same by order dated 22‑11‑1986.

3. The petitioner has now moved this Court.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that there is no allegation of rape against the petitioner. He is in judicial lock‑up. His person is no more required by the police.

5. A. A.‑G. opposed the bail on the ground that the Additional Sessions Judge did not consider the case of the petitioner on merits. He mechanically dismissed the application because the bail had been cancelled by the High Court. A.A.‑G. further submitted that the proper course open to the petitioner is to apply afresh to the Additional Sessions Judge, who be directed to decide the same on merits.

6. I am inclined to agree with the learned A.A.‑G. The petitioner may, if so advised, move the Additional Sessions Judge, who is hereby directed to decide the same in accordance with law on merits without being prejudiced by the previous order.

S. A. /F‑9/L. Direction issued.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
tax advocates from Fizagat lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.