Lawyers Directory Listing
Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.
Criminal Miscellaneous No.3604/H of 1986, decided on 11th February 1987.
‑‑‑Ss. 497 & 265‑K‑‑Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S. 302/34‑‑Bail, grant of‑‑ Eye‑witnesses not supporting prosecution in their statements under S.164, Cr.P.C.‑‑ Challan submitted before Sessions Judge‑‑Accused directed to file application under S.265‑K, Cr.P. C. before Sessions Judge, seized of case‑‑Petition disposed of accordingly.
Ch. Abdur Rashid Gujjar for Petitioner.
Altaf Muhammad Khan for the State.
In support of this bail application it is vehemently argued by the learned counsel for the petitioner that all the eye‑witnesses are not supporting the prosecution case inasmuch as they have made statements under section 164 Cr.P.C., denying to have seen the occurrence. On the other hand, learned counsel for the State urged that the statements of the eye‑witnesses made during the investigation are to the contrary and in their statements under section 161 Cr. P. C. the witnesses fully support the prosecution version.
2. The challan in this case was submitted as far as on 28‑5‑1986. In the interest of justice I will direct the learned counsel for the petitioner to move an application under section 265‑K, Cr.P.C. before the Sessions Judge, Jhang, who is seized of the case. The learned Sessions Judge shall consider that application and shall dispose of the same within three weeks of the institution of the said application.
3. With these observations this petition stands disposed of.
S.A.4‑6/L Petition disposed of.
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer