Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.
Criminal Miscellaneous No. 3587/B of 1986, decided on 4th February, 1987.
‑‑‑S. 497‑‑Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S. 302‑‑Bail, grant of‑‑Petitioner neither named in F.I. R. nor allegedly causing any injury to deceased‑ Held, it was a case of further inquiry, in circumstances‑‑Petitioner allowed bail.
M. Naeem Ullah Khan Shervani for Petitioners.
Muhammad Rafi Siddiqui for the State.
At the very outset it may be stated that learned counsel for the petitioner does not press the bail application of Mahmood Hussain. Accordingly, his application is dismissed.
2. As regards Abid Hussain petitioner, it is stated that he is named in the F.I. R. and further that only role of catching hold of Muhammad Shafi deceased is attributed to him in the supplementary statement made by Meraj Din complainant. He states that four other co‑accused were specifically mentioned in the F.I.R. but there was no mention at all of the persons or any other accused.
Since the petitioner is not alleged to have caused any injury to the deceased and his name does not find mention in the F.I. R. it seems to be a case of further inquiry. Accordingly, I grant the petition and admit the petitioner to bail in the sum of Rs.20,000 with two sureties in the like amount to the satisfaction of A.C. Sialkot.
S.G.D./M‑22/L Bail allowed.
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer