Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

MUNAWAR AHMAD versus STATE


None of the witnesses to the Criminal Code (CRPC) Section 497 Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Section 302 Bail Bureau testified against the witnesses accused of extra-judicial confession belonging to several districts and almost open. Recovery of a licensed revolver without open space. Month Guarantee Approved

1987 P Cr. L J 594

[Lahore]

Before Mazharul Haq, J

MUNAWAR AHMAD--Petitioner

versus

THE STATE--Respondent

Criminal Miscellaneous No. 2612/B of 1982, decided on 24th October, 1982.

Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)--

---S. 497--Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S.302--Bail--No eye-witness of occurrence-- Prosecution collected circumstantial evidence against accused--Witnesses of - extra-judicial confession belonging to different district--Recovery of unlicensed revolver made from open space after about one month--Bail granted.

Akmal Saleemi and Mehmood Ahmad Chaudhry for Appellant.

Salma Tasadaq for the State.

Date of hearing: 24th October, 1982.

ORDER

Munawwar Ahmad, petitioner, is accused of the murder of Abdul Aziz. A case under section 302, P.P.C. was registered against him at Police Station Sadar, Gujranwala on 27-9-1981.

2. Sister of Abdul Aziz (deceased) was married to the brother of the petitioner. It is alleged that Abdul Aziz (deceased) developed relations with petitioner's sister for which reason her hand in marriage was refused him and he had threatened to abduct her. Therefore, the petitioner bore a grudge against him and killed him when no one was around.

3. In this case there is no eye-witness. Prosecution has collected circumstantial evidence against the accused. P.W. Bashir is witness who saw the accused and the deceased on the night of occurrence. Shabbir Hussain and Manzoor Hussain are the two witnesses of one whom he is alleged to have made an extra-judicial confession. Prosecution also recovered petitioner's pair of shoes from near the place of occurrence. He also got recovered revolver from an open place near the road side. Rana Muhammad Sharif, another witness, had seen the accused leaving barefooted from near the place of occurrence.

4. The revolver is unlicensed. It is recovered from an open space. Witnesses of extra-judicial confession belong to Mauza Prigri, District Gujranwala whereas the petitioner is said to be a resident of Batapur, Lahore. He had no connection with these two. The recovery is also made about a month after the alleged occurrence. Keeping these circumstances in view, the petitioner is allowed bail in the sum of Rs.25,000 (Rs. twenty-five thousand) with two sureties each in like amount to the satisfaction of A. C. /Duty Magistrate, Gujranwala.

S. A. /4336/L Bail allowed.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
immigration advocates contact from Kotla Jam lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.