Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

SULEMAN versus STATE


Criminal Code of Conduct (CR PC) Sections 497 (XLV of 1860), Sections 324 and 326/34 Guarantees, Grant of prisoner in prison for more than four months, benefit of such confusion, of such confusion. Will be taken advantage of. Naturally, bail is to go to the accused at the bail stage. [Bail in doubt]

1987 P Cr. L J 572

[Lahore]

Before Sardar Muhammad Dogar, J

SULEMAN and another--Petitioners

versus

THE STATE--Respondent

Criminal Miscellaneous No. 1784-B of 1986, decided on 19th July, 1986.

Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)--

---S. 497--Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Ss. 324 & 326/34--Bail, grant of--Accused in jail for more than four months--Some confusion about number of injuries existing--Benefit of such confusion, held, would naturally go to accused at bail stage--Bail allowed in circumstances.- [Benefit of doubt].

Shabbir Lali for Petitioners.

Farrukh Humayun for the State.

ORDER

The petitioner who has been arrested in a case registered under section 326/34/324, P.P.C. at Police Station Musakhel, District Mianwali, on 15-11-1985, seeks bail on the grounds that no motive is alleged against him and that the injury which resulted in fracture, has been specifically assigned to his co-accused Suleman. In this regard learned counsel for the petitioner contended that the second injury mentioned in the Medico-legal report is the result of the first one.

2. Learned counsel for the State without adverting to the fact, whether the two injuries were the result of one blow or two, submitted that as the petitioner (Nur Muhammad) had come armed with the co-accused, he shared common intention and so he does not deserve to be released on bail.

3. The petitioner (Nur Muhammad) is in jail since more than four months. There is some confusion about the number of injuries. The benefit of the same at the present stage will naturally go to the petitioner. In the circumstances, he is directed to be released on bail on his furnishing a bail bond in the sum of Rs.10,000 with one surety in the like amount, to the satisfaction of Assistant Commissioner/ trial Court, Mianwali.

4. I have avoided expressing any opinion whether the two injuries mentioned in the medico-legal report are the result of one blow or not purposely so that the trial Court is able to decide the matter independently, after recording the evidence.

S.A. /764/L Bail allowed.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
tax advocates from Dera Nawab Sahib lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.