Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

GHULAM HUSSAIN versus ABDUL KARIM


Criminal Code of Conduct (CRPC) Sections 497 (5) Section 302 and 307/34 of the Conduct Rule (XLV of 1860), canceling the ineffective firing of joint intent, canceling the question of sharing of intentions with the respondents, needing further investigation Refused to be

1987 P Cr. L J 271

[Lahore]

Before Ijaz Nisar, J

GHULAM HUSSAIN--Petitioner

versus

ABDUL KARIM and others--Respondents

Criminal Miscellaneous No.3036-B of 1986, decided on 18th November, 1986.

Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)--

---S. 497(5)--Penal Code (XLV of 1860). Ss. 302 & 307/34--Bail, cancellation of--Common intention--ineffective firing attributed to respondents--Question of sharing common intention with co-accused, requiring further inquiry--Cancellation declined.

Shahid Hussain Kadri for the Petitioner.

ORDER

This is an application for the cancellation of bail of Abdul Karim and Abdul Majid respondents allowed to them in a case under section 302/307/34, P.P.C. allowed to them by this Court.

The respondent alongwith Abdur Rahim co-accused stood charged with the murder of Mst. Safia Iqbal deceased 11/12 years.

3. They were admitted to bail because only ineffective firing had been attributed to them.

The cancellation is sought, on the ground that since the respondents were also armed with guns they shared the common intention with the principal accused, namely, Abdur Rahim.

4. I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and do not find any substance in his contentions. Admittedly ineffective firing is attributed 'to the respondents. Therefore, the question as to whether they shared common intention with Abdur Rahim co-accused requires further inquiry. Consequently, the petition is dismissed.

S . A . Petition dismissed.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
property advocate from Qalandarabad lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.