Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

KHURSHID (MST.) versus STATE


Section 497 Criminal Procedure Code (XLV of 1860), Section 216 Bail, Crimes Offered by the Applicant and Ease of Escape

1987 P Cr. L J 174

[Lahore]

Before Muhammad Rafiq Tarar, J

Mst. KHURSHID--Petitioner

versus

THE STATE--Respondent

Criminal Miscellaneous No. 3220/13 of 1986, decided on 7th December, 1986.

Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)--

---S. 497--Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S.216--Bail, grant of--Allegedly petitioner harboured proclaimed offenders and facilitated their escape- Petitioner, a woman and offence not falling within prohibitory clause of S.497, Cr. P.C. allowed bail, in circumstances.

Malik Noor Muhammad Awan for Petitioner.

Mian Aslam Khan for the State.

ORDER

Mst. Khurshid petitioner has moved this petition for bail in a case registered against her and others under sections 216/307 and 353 P.P.C.

2. The prosecution version is that on 17-9-1986 Muhammad Aslam A.S.I. received information that Ameera and Abdur Razzaq proclaimed offenders were present in the house of Ghulam Rasool in village Manda Khail upon which a raiding party consisting of Rana Muhammad Fazal D.S.P. and other police officials surrounded the house of aforesaid Ghulam Rasool On reaching near the wall of the Haveli of Ghulam Rasool, Muhammad Aslam A.S.I. saw Mst. Khurshid Bibi walking in the courtyard of the Haveli. On seeing the police party she ran into a room of the Haveli and informed the proclaimed offenders about the arrival of the police. The proclaimed offenders started firing at the police party. The police party also fired in defence. Both the proclaimed offenders went into fields from the back side of the house and disappeared. In the F.I.R. it is alleged that the petitioner harboured them and facilitated their escape.

3. I have heard the learned counsel for the parties. So far as the petitioner is concerned, the allegations in the F.I.R. disclose the commission of offence under section 216, P.P.C. The petitioner is a woman and the offence does not fall within the prohibitory clause. I, therefore, admit her to bail in the sum of Rs.25,000 with two sureties in the like amount to the satisfaction of Assistant Commissioner/ Duty Magistrate, Mianwali.

S. G. D. Bail allowed.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
solicitors from Dadu lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.