Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

MUHAMMAD ANNAR versus STATE


Criminal Code of Criminal Procedure (CRPC) Sections 497 (XLV of 1860), Sections 302 and 307/34 Guarantees, Grants, Investigation of the accused on the charge of killing a woman involved in the shootings and injuring the other accused. Investigation officer declared baseless by officer Certificate issued by the Commanding Officer, which is to be shown to the accused in his unit on the following day, on the basis of conviction on reasonable grounds, reasonable grounds to prove guilt, not the present accused, arrested, entitled to bail in the circumstances. Was

1987 P Cr. L J 97

[Lahore]

Before Rustam S. Sidhwa, J

MUHAMMAD ANNAR--Petitioner

versus

THE STATE--Respondent

Criminal Miscellaneous No. 2367/B of 1986, decided on 10th November, 1986.

Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)--

---S. 497--Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Ss. 302 & 307/34--Bail, grant of--Accused allegedly indulging in firing resulting in death of one lady and injuring other--Accused found innocent by Investigating Officer on basis of certificate issued by Commanding Officer showing accused to be present in his unit on day of occurrence--Reasonable grounds for believing accused to be guilty of offence imputed, not existing--Accused, held, was entitled to bail in circumstances.

Muhammad. Saleem for Petitioner.

Sh. Ehsan Ahmed for the State.

ORDER

This is a petition under section 497, Cr.P. C. by Muhammad Annar, petitioner, for bail in respect of a case instituted against him and one other under section 302/307/34, P.P.C. at Police. Station Kothiala Sheikhan on 11-3-1985.

2. The prosecution case in brief is that on 11-3-1985 at about 12-00 noon when Muhammad Nawaz, complainant, alongwith his sister Mst. Parveen and his relation Mst. Sakina Bibi, with her little baby, were going from Chak No. 14 to Kuthiala Sheikhan, they were accosted by Sikandar, co-accused, and Annar Khan, petitioner. The latter was armed with a gun. Sikandar, co-accused, abused Muhammad Nawaz, complainant, and uttered a Lalkara that he would taste the fruit for not giving his vote to his partyman, when Muhammad Annar, petitioner, opened fire, missing the complainant, but hitting Mst. Sakina Bibi, deceased, and her little baby. Muhammad Annar, petitioner, fired again, hitting Mst. Parveen Akhtar. Mst. Sakina Bibi died on the spot. The occurrence was witnessed by Zafar Iqbal and Mutalli P.Ws. The motive for the occurrence was that both the accused were annoyed with the complainant, because he had not voted for Muhammad Hayat in the election.

3. I have heard the arguments of the learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. It appears that Muhammad Annar, petitioner, was found innocent in police investigation, on the basis of a certificate issued by the Commanding Officer, 59-Baluch Regiment, Abbottabad, certifying that the petitioner was present in the unit on 10-1-1985 and 11-1-1985 and had not been granted any leave of absence, on 10-1-1985. The name of the petitioner has also been placed in column No. 2 of the challan. In this view of the matter, there are no unequivocal circumstances from which it can be inferred that there are reasonable grounds for believing that the petitioner is guilty of the offences imputed to him. In these circumstances, without going on 'the record as having given any opinion in the matter, I would only say, for the limited purposes of this petition, that the petitioner is entitled to be released on bail.

4. For the foregoing reasons, this petition is accepted and Muhammad Annar, petitioner, is released on bail, subject to his furnishing security in the sum of rupees thirty thousand (Rs.30, 000) with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Assistant Commissioner, Mandi Bahauddin.

S. A. Bail allowed.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
law firms from Makli lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.