Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

ALLAH DITTA versus THE STATE


Criminal Code of Conduct (CR PC) Section 497 Governing Code (XLV of 1860), S, 302/34 guarantee, grant of delayed First Information Report, which had no purpose in killing the victim, but to the complainant. The purpose of your lies can be stated. Further inquiry into the case against the accused requires further investigation.

1987 M L D 2648

[Lahore]

Before Muhammad Munir

Khan, J

MUHAMMAD TANVEER AHMAD--Petitioner

versus

THE STATE--Respondent

Criminal Miscellaneous Petition No.1354 of 1987, decided on lath May, 1987.

Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)--

---S.497--Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S.382--Bail, grant of--Eye witnesses including complainant refused to support allegation against accused in affidavit sworn by them--Question of guilt/innocence of accused requiring further inquiry--Bail granted.

Ch. Muhammad Saleem Raza for Petitioner.

Ch. Ashraf Hijazee for the State.

ORDER

This is an application for the grant of bail to Muhammad Tanveer Ahmad petitioner in a case under section 382 PPC registered at Police Station North Cantt, Lahore vide FIR No.95/1987 dated 19-3-1987.

2. The allegations against the petitioner are that he forcibly snatched away Rs.200 and some other articles from Mst. Aisha Bibi complainant.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the eye witnesses including the complainant have sworn affidavits exonerating the petitioner from the commission of the crime. Mst.Aisha Bibi comp lainant is very much present in the Court. She owns affidavit Annex: wherein she has exonerated the petitioner from the commission of offence. The learned counsel for the State is not in a position to controvert the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner.

4. I have considered the submissions made by the learned counsel for the parties with care. I find that all the eye-witnesses including the complainant have refused to support the allegations against the petitioner in affidavits sworn by them. That being the position, I am of: the view that the question of guilt/innocence of the petitioner requires further enquiry.

5. For what has been said above, the petitioner is allowed bail in the sum of Rs.10,000 with one surety in the like amount to the P satisfaction of Assistant Commissioner, City/Duty Magistrate, Lahore.

M.Y.H./M-404/L Bail granted.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
immigration advocate from Sukkur lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.