KHALID ANWAR versus ZIA UL HAQ RAUF

The pre-emption presidency case of the Punjab Pre-Emission Act 1913 Section 15 is based on the fact that he was the real son of a shopkeeper who sold the land in the absence of the country and the petitioner objected to it. Was. For the benefit of the seller and another person, the courts permanently rejected the decision-making case, dismissing the appeal petitioner's request that Malala's case be considered premature, by her son. In his testimony, no such suggestion was made to the respondents; the respondent, on the other hand, explained that the shopkeeper was angry with his conduct while refusing to return to Pakistan, for which the alleged reply. The prosecution brought the case had nothing to do with it nor was it shown to have any connection and He was raised a dispute with him. Evidence, the suit could not easily be considered defamatory if the act of sale by the father was the result of the defendant's displeasure with the fact that the respondent was then sold abroad, five of them Either, he did not interfere with his father's sale or before he vacated them.

1987 M L D 2547

[Lahore]

Before Afrasiab Khan, J

M.FARANI, BARRISTER-AT-LAW--Petitioner

versus

LAHORE MUNICIPAL CORPORATION and others--Respondents

Writ Petition No.3311 of 1987, decided on 25th July, 1987.

Constitution of Pakistan (1973)-----

---Art.199--Punjab Local Government Ordinance (VI of 1979), Ss.52, 60 & 80--Performance of compulsory functions under Ss.52 & 60- Petitioner filing constitutional petition for directions to Municipal Corporation to perform its compulsory functions under Ss.52, 60 & 80 in respect of specified street-Respondent Corporation having given assurance to Court to construct the road without loss of time, petition was disposed of as having borne fruit.

Petitioner in person.

ORDER

The petitioner Mr. M. Farani, Barrister-at-Law has moved this Constitutional petition praying therein that the respondent Lahore Municipal Corporation, Lahore, be directed to perform its compulsory functions under sections 52, 60 and 80 of the Punjab Local Government Ordinance (VI of 1979) with regard to street No.36-S, Bank Street, Bastami Road, Samanabad, Lahore. Respondent No.1 was directed to submit a report with parawise comments and a direction was issued to the learned Legal Advisor of the respondent to appear before this Court today. In compliance with the order learned counsel for the respondent as well as the representative of the respondent have appeared before me. The Sub-Engineer of the Lahore Municipal Corporation, Lahore, has made a categorical statement saying that they will construct the road within a period of one month. He has further stated that, they will level the road with the roller immediately so as to enable the petitioner to use the same.

Statement of Zahoor Ahmad, Sub-Engineer, Zone No.3 Lahore Municipal Corporation, Lahore, on S.A.

I am Sub-Engineer of the Lahore Municipal Corporation, Lahore.

I hereby give assurance that the Corporation will, within a period of one month, complete the construction of the road known as Bank Street Bastami Road, Samanabad, Lahore. The Corporation will start the construction work without losing any time. The street will be levelled by using the roller immediately.

2. In view of the statement having been made by the representative of the respondent Corporation, this petition is accordingly disposed of as having borne fruit.

H.B.T./M-403/L Order accordingly.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer

Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad

best advocate from Fort Abbas lawyer

Lawyers Directory Listing

Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

KHALID ANWAR versus ZIA UL HAQ RAUF

Find a Lawyer Near You