Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

NIEHAR ELAHI versus MAULVI GHULAM QADIR


Judicial Fees on pre-emption claims filed by the Appellant, Section 15 of the Code of Civil Procedure 1908 and OVII, R11 Court Fees Act (VII 1870), Section 7 Punjab Pre-Emission Act (I13 of 1913) The Second Appeal to Payable I Identified for the First Time The Appellate Court ruled that a portion of the land was the land of the garden, overturned by the appellate court over the trial court's decision on a lack of court fees. Appellant is not allowed at any time due to deficiency deficiency even though the appellate court made one reduction. The appellant's contentious situation, the appellant, cannot afford any negligence or contradiction, in his view was to pay a reasonable court fee under section 7 (v) (a) of the Court Fees Act 1870. If the appellate court's order and the appellate court's order were set aside for the first time by the appellate court for the presence of a garden in any part of the land and the appellant's order was heard in the case, the tennis reduction The trial was held in the trial court to allow the case to be calculated and to pay a limited time.

1987 M L D 2546

[Lahore]

Present: Rustam S. Sidhwa, J

MUHAMMAD YOUNUS--Petitioner

versus

COLONY ASSISTANT/ COLLECTOR, SAHIWAL--Respondent

Writ Petition No.443 of 1982, decided on 9th June, 1982.

Colonization of Government Lands (Punjab) Act (V of 1912)--

--S.10--Petitioner a lessee of certain State land apprehending that part of land was being taken over for schools and playgrounds and applying for extension of lease before Colony Assistant--Application was reported by Colony Department as pending due to non-production of copies of Khasra Girdawaris and Register Haqdaran--Held, petition was, premature as there was no final order on application of petitioner--Petitioner could go into appeal against final order- Petitioner instructed to produce relevant documents before Colony Assistant/ Collector who was directed to decide same within one month.

Abdul Sattar Goraya for Petitioner.

Tassadduq Hussain Jilani, A.A.-G. for Respondent.

Date of hearing: 9th June, 1982.

ORDER.

The report and parawise comments of the respondent have been received and perused.

2. It appears that the petitioner's application for extension of the lease relating to the total area specified in para 1 of the petition is still pending with the Colony Assistant/ Collector, Sahiwal, and no action has been taken thereon. The report of the respondent states that no action could be taken, as the petitioner had failed to produce the relevant documents, such as copies of Khasra, girdawaries, register haqdaran zamin etc., as required by law.

3. It appears that this petition is premature as there is no final order which has been passed on the petitioner's petition for extension of lease. When such an order is passed, the petitioner can' also prefer an appeal against the same. The petitioner should, therefore, produce the relevant documents before the Colony Assistant/ Collector, Sahiwal, immediately, so that his application can be processed. This should be done as early as possible. I hereby direct the Colony Assistant/ Collector, Sahiwal, to dispose of the petitioner's application within a month. It is the case of the petitioner that at the instance of a person who is his enemy, some attempt is being made to take away certain part of his killas for schools, whereas the Education Department is not wanting his killas but certain other area. The Colony Assistant/ Colldctor, Sahiwal, should also examine whether any parts of the petitioner's land already resumed or to be resumed for schools and playgrounds were or are being so legally and validly resumed, in terms of paras 373/495 of the Colony Manual, Volume I, and the latest instructions of the Board of Revenue, on the subject. With this observation, this petition stands disposed of accordingly.

S. A . /3037/L Petition accordingly.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
attorney vs advocate vs counsel from Khanqah Sharif lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.