Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

SAID SHAH versus MST.KHURSHID BIBI


The Code of Civil Code 1908 reads with Section 115 Section 96 and A. XXXIX, RR 1 and 2 Demarcation Act (IX of 1908), at the request of the plaintiff for temporary relief, in connection with the Section 5 Village Site Trial Court Declaration, Plaintiff Applicant's Order to Ban Plaintiff Plaintiffs Applicants were subsequently dismissed from claiming property in violation of a temporary injunction, on their appeal against the trial court's order. A re-occupation was ordered, which led to the district judge's dismissal request. It is not mentioned in the lower unexpected decision of the petitioner's delay in filing the petition with the memorandum of appeal, which led to the original record of the lower appellate court being moved even by a separate district judge. An order was not passed regarding the settlement of such application which was necessary before coming to this appeal. Applicants were banned from time to time because of non-judgmental, not legally durable, revision request was allowed and according to the law the applicant for contempt of delay was dismissed in the case. Was remanded to the lower appellate court for a fresh verdict.

1987 M L D 2493

[Lahore]

Before Abaid Ullah Khan and Akhtar Hassan, JJ

MUSLIM COMMERCIAL BANK Ltd.--Appellant

versus

Messrs PAKAISIA (Pvt.) Ltd.--Respondent

Regular First Appeal No.28 of 1981, decided on 3rd March, 1987.

Banking Companies (Recovery of Loans) Ordinance (XIX of 1979)--

---S.8(2)--Payment of interest on judgment debt--Special Court is required by law as it stood at the relevant time to direct payment of interest on judgment debt from date of decree till payment--Omission to give such direction amounts to illegality--Decree of Special Court omitting such direction was modified by High Court without interfering with mode of payment of decretal amount prescribed by Special Court.

Masood Javed for Appellant.

Nemo for Respondent.

Date of hearing: 3rd March, 1987.

JUDGMENT

ABAID ULLAH KHAN, J.--

This appeal impugns the decree passed by the learned Special Judge (Banking), Rawalpindi, on the 27th November, 1980, in the suit brought by the appellant against the respondents for the recovery of the outstanding debt amounting to Rs.3,55,976.86 only to the extent that it did not provide for interest on the judgment debt from the date of decree till payment as required by section 8(2) of the Banking Companies (Recovery of Loans) Ordinance, 1979, then in force and that -it allowed the respondents to pay the decretal amount by instalments.

2. It is true that the learned Special Judge was required to direct payment of interest on the judgment debt from the date of the decree till payment at the contracted rate or at the rate of two per cent above the bank rate whichever was higher as ordained by the aforesaid provision of law. Omission to order such payment of interest amounts to illegality which must be set right; the respondents will have to pay the interest.

3. As stated by the learned counsel for the appellant the respondents are paying the instalments regularly. Since the appellant will get interest on the judgment debt till its final payment we do not consider it proper in the circumstances to alter mode of payment.

4. In view of the above the appeal is partially accepted and the decree of Special Court is modified to provide for payment of interest on the judgment debt from the date of decree till payment thereof at the contracted rate of fourteen per cent per annum. The amount of interest will also be paid in instalments like the decretal amount after the payment of the decretal amount is exhausted.

H.B.T./M-386/L Decree modified.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
law websites from Lasbela lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.