Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

NOOR SAMAND versus THE STATE


Criminal Code of Conduct (CRPC) Section 514 Bail Bond, Applicant's arrest, Bail history, Still presenting the accused through a sense of responsibility, demanding further consideration and a soft view

1987 M L D 2328

[Lahore]

Before Rashid Aziz Khan, J

MUHAMMAD SADIQ and another--Petitioners

versus

THE STATE--Respondent

Criminal Miscellaneous No.3 of 1987 in Criminal Appeal No.471 of 1985, decided on 22nd August, 1987.

Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)- --

---S.426(1-A)--Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S.302--Conviction under S.302, P.P.C.-- Appeal to High Court against conviction adjourned from time to time and convict /appellant in jail for four years Bail application on statutory ground under S.426 (1-A), Cr.P.C. granted on furnishing of bail bonds in sum of Rs.25,000 with two sureties each in like amount.

Inayat Ullah Cheema for Petitioners.

Ch. Muhammad Mansha for the State.

ORDER

A case under section 302/307/34, P.P.C. was registered against the petitioners and two others. The petitioners were arrested on 29-5-1983. The learned Additional Sessions Judge vide his judgment dated 23-6-85 convicted both the petitioners to life imprisonment. Learned counsel contends that statutory period of two years has since been lapsed but the appeal of the petitioners has not been heard which entitles the petitioners to the grant of bail. It is further contended that earlier the case was fixed for hearing but the same was adjourned as left over. Submits that the learned counsel for the complainant is on general adjournment, therefore, the case is not likely to be heard till the learned counsel for the complainant is available.

I have seen the record. The petitioners are in jail for the last over four years. Their appeal did come up for hearing but was adjourned as left over. Without going into the merits of the case, I direct that the petitioners be released on bail subject to their furnishing bail bonds in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty-five thousand only) each, with two sureties each, in the like amount to the satisfaction of the A . C. /Faisalabad.

K.B.A./M-340/L Bail granted.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
best law firm from Vehari lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.