Section 2 302 / intention Q Katil Omar, Joint Complainant, initially nominated one person in his FIR and two unidentified complainants also included two other persons in the FIR, During the investigation, the innocent complainant was found dissatisfied with the results of the investigation. In this case, a private complaint was launched, in which it named two male suspects, and a female trial court summoned the two male defendants to stand trial, but the woman refused to be prosecuted. Kurdiya, said that the three accused men and women were not designated complainants in their initial FIR at the police station, but later, as a result of the investigation, the complainant was forced to file a private complaint which was called That the three accused are as advertised, neither the names of the three accused mentioned in the FIR, nor any of the accused complaining It was alleged that the complainant could not properly dispute the FIR registration at a good stage, in which the complainant was unable to contact, it was said that the three accused persons. No complaint was filed in this case which stated that during the investigation of the three accused, till submission of challan, which made it clear that after considering the matter, the complainant made some dishonest improvement and made a private complaint. , And reported the three suspects as interim, with a delay of six months after the FIR was registered. He said the suspects were residents of the area which was far from where the incident took place and who had
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2014
