Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

MUHAMMAD SARWAR versus THE STATE


Sections 302, 148 and 149 of the first information FIR of the original document were not completed at two different locations, which stated that after the initial investigation it was debated and the members of the police complaint party and the police witnesses Was brought to the record in the account of the unreliable, highly suspicious witnesses on the spot told an altered story stating that they did not actually see the apparent conflict between the medical and the ocular testimony and the crime. Prosecutor failed to indict house, reasonable suspect was not released on suspicion Besides, the crime and punishment against the accused have been set aside in the circumstances

1987 M L D 2024

[Lahore]

Before Khizar Hayat, J

MUHAMMAD RAMZAN and others--Petitioners

versus

THE STATE--Respondent

Criminal Miscellaneous No. 2002/B of 1987, decided on 7th July, 1987.

Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)--

---S.497--Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S.365--Bail, grant of--Alleged abductee produced by her uncle during investigation- -Abductee stating to have contracted marriage of her own free will--Investigating Officer stated of no offence committed by accused and that accused would be got discharged--Bail granted in circumstances.

Syed Dilawar Hussain for Petitioners.

Awais Naseem for the State.

ORDER

Muhammad Rafiq, the complainant, reported at Police Station Batapur, District Lahore, on 20-2-1987 that about a month before i.e. 23-1-1987, his daughter Mst. Irshad Begum, aged 14/15 years was enticed away by Mst. Parveen, wife of Ramzan petitioner, on the pretext that some of her (Mst. Parveen) guests wanted to see her in her house. Thereafter, she did not return home. The complainant went to the house of Mst. Parveen and found her as well as her husband (Ramzan) missing. The complainant was told by Muhammad Munir and Bashir P.Ws. that they had seen Mst. Irshad abductee sitting in a wagon in the company of Ramzan and Amir Ali petitioners and Mst. Parveen at Jallomore, which was bound for Lahore. The case was accordingly registered.

2. During the investigation Mst. Irshad was produced before the investigating officer on 13-6-1987 by her uncle Muhammad Sadiq. She was medically examined and was found to be 16/17 years old. Her statement was recorded under section 164, Cr.P.C. by a Magistrate on the next day wherein she stated that she 'had contracted marriage with Rustam Ali of her own free will.

3. A.S.I. Zakir Hussain, the investigating officer, who is present with record, states that according to his investigation no offence has been committed by the petitioner. He further states that he had obtained legal opinion from Inspector (Legal) who has suggested that the accused may be got discharged but they have not so far been discharged. In the circumstances narrated above, I shall allow this petition. The petitioners are directed to be released on bail subject petition. their furnishing bail bonds in the sum of Rs. 10,000 each with one surety each in the like amount to the satisfaction of Assistant Commissioner/ Duty Magistrate, Lahore Cantt.

S. A . /M-304/L

Bail allowed.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
law websites from Sakrand lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.