Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

AKHTAR ALI versus THE STATE


Criminal Code of Conduct (CR PC) Sections 497 Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Sections 148, 302, 307, 325 and 326/149 bail, ground accused of delay of more than two years at the end of the legal ground grant trial Anomalous, unlawful right to be released on bail, granted bail

1987 M L D 2007

[Lahore]

Before Muhammad Munir Khan, J

MUHAMMAD AKRAM--Petitioner

versus

THE STATE--Respondent

Criminal Miscellaneous No.1992/B of 1987, decided on 4th July, 1987.

Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)--

---S.497--Offence of Zina (Enforcement of Hudood) Ordinance (VII of 1979), Ss.10 & 11--Bail, grant of--No allegation of commission of Zina against petitioner and at the most case was one of elopement of abductee with co-accused--Petitioner allowed bail, in circumstances.

M. Iqbal Cheema for Petitioner.

ORDER

This is an application for grant of bail to Muhammad Akram petitioner in a case under section 10/16 of the Offence of Zina (Enforcement of Hudood) Ordinance, 1979, registered at P.S. South Cantt. Lahore vide FIR No.86/87 dated 17-4-1987.

2. The prosecution case is that the petitioner and others took away Mst. Yasmeen wife of Ghulam Hussain complainant in order to subject her to illicit intercourse.

3 Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that there is no evidence of the Commission of Zina by the petitioner with the alleged abductee and that it is a case of elopement of Mst. Yasmeen with Pappu co-accused. Learned counsel for the State has opposed this application.

9 I have considered the submissions made by the learned counsel for the parties with care. I find that there are no allegations of the commission of Zina against the petitioner and that the prosecution case is that when the complainant came to his house from duty, he found that the house was locked and his wife was missing. On opening the lock he found" that golden ornaments weighing 4 tolas and Rs.6,000/- had also been removed from the house.

For what has been said above, I feel that a case for grant of bail to the petitioner has been made out. He is, therefore, allowed bail in the sum of Rs.10, 000/- with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of A. C . /Duty Magistrate City, Lahore.

S.G.D./M 290/L.

Bail allowed.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
immigration advocates from Lasbela lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.