Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

SARWAR versus THE STATE


Criminal Code of Conduct (CCPC) Section 497 Offense Hood (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance (VII of 1979); Disclose the type of litigation and the woman. Criminal Investigation Investigation Complete Bail Approved

1987 M L D 1999

[Lahore]

Before Khizar Hayat, J

GHULAM SHABBIR--Petitioner

versus

THE STATE--Respondent

Criminal Miscellaneous No. 1747/B of 1987, decided on 21st June, 1987.

Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)--

---S.497--Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S.457--Bail, grant of--Accused a shopkeeper having no previous history as criminal--No instrument of theft recovered--Accused not armed with any weapon--Challan already submitted in Court--Intention to commit theft yet to be established--Bail granted in circumstances.

M. Iqbal Cheema for Petitioner.

Muhammad Hanif Zahid assisted by Malik Nazir Ahmad for the State

ORDER

Ghulam Shabbir, petitioner, is stated to have broken into the house of the 'complainant on the night between 5/6-5-1987 where he was caught from underneath a Charpoi. He was produced before the police at 11-50 p.m., the same night and F.I.R. No. 157, dated 6-5-1987 was registered under section 457, P.P. C. at Police Station Shahdara, Lahore. The petitioner having remained unsuccessful to obtain the relief of bail from the lower Court has moved the instant petition. I have heard the parties and perused the record.

2. S.I. Muhammad Hanif states that the petitioner stated before him during investigation that he deals in cycle-seats and has established a regular shop for the purpose in the locality. The petitioner has no previous history as a criminal. Admittedly, no instrument of committing theft was recovered from him. He was not found armed with any weapon either. Challan against the petitioner has since been submitted in Court.

3. In view of the facts narrated above, it remains to be established that the petitioner had entered the house of the complainant with I intention to commit the offence of theft. In the circumstances, I feel inclined to allow this petition. The petitioner is directed to be released on bail subject to his furnishing bail-bonds in the sum of Rs. 20,000 with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of A. C., City, Lahore.

S.A ./G-64/ L

Bail granted.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
jobs for fresh advocates from Mailsi lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.