Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

MUHAMMAD SAEED versus S.H.O., P.S. SHAH BHORE, DISTRICT OKARA


Constitution of Pakistan 1973 Article 199 jurisdictional cross-case registration and investigation of the incident revealed the finalization of the two reports sought by the police superintendent in a free and neutral way. It is reported that a request from the other party to launch the attack has been received. Absent in the investigation, all the accused were found guilty by the Inquiry Officer of the High Court for their alleged use of the jurisdiction of writ, ?? Will not enter the scope of facts to determine the accuracy or otherwise the allegations contained in the writ petition Because of this, the applicant can resort to an independent complaint before himself. The trial court writ petition was dropped

1987 M L D 1838

[Lahore]

Before: Muhammad Sharif, J

GHULAM HUSSAIN and another--Petitioners

Versus

THE STATE--Respondent

Criminal Miscellaneous No. 483-B of 1987/BWP, decided on 20th April, 1987.

Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)--

---S.497--Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S.307/326/34--Bail, grant of- Accused stated to be an old man of seventy years, weak and infirm and suffering from disease of hemiplegi--Co-accused kept standing with a pistol and did not fire at all--Both accused and co-accused granted bail.

Qaiser Mahmood Shafi for Petitioner.

Aun Muhammad Rizvi for the State.

JUDGMENT

The petitioners have been arrested under section 307/326/34, P.P.C. They have petitioned for being released on bail.

2. According to the F.I.R., the petitioner asked .4bdullah Khan, the complainant, to go to village Sheikh Abdul Sattar as they were to recover money from Nathoo. The complainant accompanied them. When they reached near a sugar-cane field in the area of village Pir Bakhsh Khori, both Ghulam Hussain and Faqiru took out their knives and said to him that they would teach him a lesson for their being dishonoured by the police at the instance of the complainant by restraining them from committing thefts from the sugar-cane field. Farooq and Manzoor son of Gul Muhammad also emerged. Farooq had a pistol who stood nearby and Manzoor Ahmad felled the complainant on the ground and Ghulam Hussain and Faqiru both slashed his nose and lips.

3. The role given to Farooq is that he kept standing there with a pistol. Heinous role has been ascribed to Ghulam Hussain who cut the nose of the complainant, who is a councillor.

4. The bail petition of Ghulam Hussain has been urged on medical ground. He is stated to be an old man of 70 years and is weak and infirm. He is suffering from the disease of hemiplegi. Farooq did not B fire at all on the spot and the petitioner Ghulam Hussain is old and infirm. 1, therefore, release both the petitioners on bail in the sum of Rs. 5,000 each with one surety each in the like amount to the satisfaction of Assistant Commissioner/ Duty Magistrate Khanpur till the disposal of the case against them.

M.Y.H./G-66/L ----- Bail granted.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
us immigration advocates from Naukot lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.