Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

KUHAMMAD AKRAM versus HABIB KHAN


Criminal Code of Conduct (CR PC) Section 526 Criminal Code (XLV of 1860), Section 302/34 Criminal Case, The trial court allegedly pressured the defendant to settle the charges, rejecting those allegations. The case was moved to another court under the principle that justice should not be just but it should be so.
1987 M L D 1809

[Lahore]

Before Muhammad Rafiq Tarar, J

IQBAL and another--Petitioners

Versus

THE STATE--Respondent

Criminal Miscellaneous No.1829/B of 1987, decided on 23rd June, 1987.

Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)--

---S.497--Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S.452--Offence of Zina (Enforcement of Hudood) Ordinance (VII of 1979), S.18--Bail, grant of--Offence prima facie falling under Ss.354 & 452, P.P.C.--Offence under S.354 being bailable and other not falling under prohibitory clause, bail granted to petitioners.

Khizar Abbas Khan for Petitioners.

Bashir Baig for the State.

Muhammad Iqbal Sargana for the Complainant.

ORDER

Iqbal and Manno petitioners have moved this petition for bail in a case registered against them under section 452 PPC and Article 18 of Ordinance VII of 1979.

2. The prosecution version is that on 9-4-1987 both the petitioners trespassed into the house of Faqir Muhammad complainant, outraged the modesty of his wife Mst.Kaneez and dragged her towards the wheat field with intent to commit Zina-bil-Jabr with her. Faqir Muhammad complainant, Noor Muhammad and Muhammad Iqbal saw the petitioners dragging her towards the said field.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioners contends that the case is absolutely false and if the petitioners wanted to commit Zina with Mst. Kaneez, there was no better place for that purpose than the house of the complainant where she was all alone. He further submits that the FIR is delayed by 26 hours, and this case was brought as a defence to the abduction of Mst. Parveen by Ahmad Nawaz, brother of Faqir Muhammad complainant.

Learned counsel for the complainant has opposed the prayer for bail. He submits that it is a case of sheer highhandedness and the petitioners are not entitled to the grant of bail.

4. I have considered the submissions made by the learned counsel for the parties. The allegations, prima facie, show the commission o offences under sections 354 and 452 of the PPC. Offence under section 354 PPC is bailable and offence under section 452 PPC does not for in the prohibitory clause of section 497 of the Cr.P.C. I, therefore, admit the petitioners to bail in the sum of Rs.20,000 each with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of A. C . Shorkot.

S.A./I-29/L Bail granted

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
list of supreme court advocates from Layyah lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.