Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

ALI AND OTHERS versus THE STATE


The Pakistan Penal Code Sections 148 and 304/149 retrieval of felony weapons do not relate to witnesses retrieving the weapons obtained by the Chemical Examiner after one month, nor do they make permanent statements on the anonymity of the accused's witnesses. No reason to deny that the chemical examiner and serologist did not find the blood transfusion after thirty days had passed, just because the weapons of crime were received by the chemical executor 30 days later, does not mean That the recoveries cannot provide contradictory evidence in the circumstances.

1987 M L D 1807

[Lahore]

Before Muhammad Rafiq Tarar; J

KUHAMMAD AKRAM--Petitioner

Versus

HABIB KHAN and 3 others--Respondents

Criminal Miscellaneous No.76-T of 1987, decided on 9th June, 1987.

Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)--

---S.526--Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S.302/34--Criminal case, transfer of--Trial Court allegedly pressurising complainant to compromise case--Court denying allegations--Case transferred to other Court in view of principle that justice should not only be done but should also appear to have been done.

Syed Waheed-ur-Rehman Gillani for Petitioner.

Ch. Shahid Saeed for the State.

Abdur Rashid Tariq for Respondents Nos.l to 3.

Date of hearing: 9th June, 1987.

JUDGMENT

Muhammad Akram petitioner has moved this petition under section 526 Cr.P.C. for transfer of the case titled State v. Habib Khan etc. under section 302/34 PPC from the Court of Sh. Mumtaz Ali, Additional Sessions Judge, Kasur, to any other Court of competent jurisdiction. A reference by the learned Sessions Judge for the transfer of the same case has also been received. The Additional Sessions Judge had requested him to withdraw the case from his Court. Since the trial had commenced, the learned Sessions Judge has sent the record to this Court for appropriate orders. Both the matters are being disposed of by this order.

2. The grounds urged for the transfer of the case are that the trial Judge has been suggesting the complainant to have a compromise with the, respondents; on 22-3-1987 he pressurised the complainant to accept Rs.50,000 and have a patch up; on the next date, the respondents brought Rs.50,000 but the petitioner refused to accept the same; the respondents have been telling the people that they will be acquitted and the complainant has a genuine apprehension that the case will not be decided on merits. In the parawise comments the learned trial Judge has denied the allegations. However, in view of the principle that justice should not only be done but should also seem to have been done, the case is withdrawn from the Court o Mr. Mumtaz Ali, Additional Sessions Judge, and transferred to the file of learned Sessions Judge, Kasur, for disposal in accordance with law.

S.A./M-270/L Case transferred.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
list of advocates from FR Peshawar lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.