Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

GHUL AM MUHAMMAD KHAN versus THE STATE


Criminal Code of Criminal Procedure (CRPC) Section 497 Property Enforcement Ordinance (VI of 1979), Section 17 bail, grant of accused in jail for almost five months and not yet sent to court. The challan was not named in them. The first information report was recovered from their stolen property as a common currency note, which did not present proper grounds for understanding that the accused had committed a crime of guilt which was accepted under the circumstances.

1987 M L D 1773

[Lahore]

Before Muhammad Munir Khan and Lehrasap Khan, JJ

AHMAD--Petitioner

Versus

THE STATE--Respondent

Criminal Miscellaneous No.3 of 1987 (in Criminal Appeal No.164 of 1985), decided on 7th'-June, 1987.

Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)--

---S.426--Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S.302/34--Suspension of sentence--Statutory delay in disposal of appeal--Appeal of accused against his conviction, filed more than two years ago, not decided so far--Accused had not caused any injury to deceased or prosecution witness and part attributed to him was that he caught hold of deceased in his 'Japha' in order to facilitate the murder--Sentence suspended on account of statutory delay in disposal of appeal.

Rai Muhammad Nawaz Kharal for Petitioner.

ORDER

MUHAMMAD MUNIR KHAN, J.

--This is an application for the suspension of the execution of sentence of Ahmi petitioner, who stands convicted under section 302/34, P.P. C. and sentenced to imprisonment for life and a fine of Rs.10,000/- or in default thereof further R.I. for 3 years.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that although the petitioner was convicted on 26-2-1986 yet his appeal has not been decided. Learned counsel for the State has opposed this application.

3. We have considered the submissions made by the learned counsel for the parties with care. We find that the petitioner was convicted on 26-2-1985; that he filed appeal, on 9-3-1985; that the appeal has not been decided so far; that the petitioner did not cause any injury to the deceased or P.W. and that the part attributed to him is that he had caught hold of the deceased in his 'Japha' in order to facilitate Yaqoob appellant to give knife blows to the deceased.

For what has been said above, we are of the view that it is fit case for the suspension of the execution of sentence on the ground of statutory delay in disposal of appeal. The petitioner is, therefore, allowed bail in the sum of Rs.20,000/- with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction' of A. C. /Duty Magistrate, Jaranwala.

M.Y.H./A-105/L Bail granted.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
patent advocate from Rajana lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.