Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

MUHAMMAD SADIQ versus THE STATE


Criminal Code of Conduct (CCPC) Sections 426 (1A) (C) of the Conduct Rule (XLV of 1860), Articles 302, 364, 148 and 149 of the sentencing appeal were not heard within two years. The sentence for this co-accused has already been suspended. In the same ground case of the accused under section 426 (1A) C1 (C), the PC sentence has been suspended under the circumstances.
1987 M L D 1659

[Lahore]

Before Ijaz Nisar, J

MUHAMMAD MUSHTAQ--Petitioner

Versus

THE STATE--Respondent

Criminal Miscellaneous No. 1 of 1987 in Criminal Appeal No. 204 of 1987, decided on 1st June, 1987.

Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)--

---S.426--Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S.302--Suspension of sentences- Conviction based only on circumstantial evidence and extra-judicial confession--Extra-judicial confession made before person in authority- Evidence of recovery of Chhuri not corroborated by any other witness--Accused a youth of 14/15 years--Sentence suspended in circumstances.

Mian Muhammad Akram Ranjha for Petitioner

ORDER

This is an application for the suspension of sentence of Muhammad Mushtaq petitioner who stands convicted under section 302, P.P.C. and sentenced to imprisonment for life plus, fine for the murder of Muhammad Ishfaq deceased.

2. Suspension of sentence is claimed on the grounds that there is no direct evidence in the case and the conviction has been recorded mainly on the basis of circumstantial evidence i.e. motive, last seen recovery of blood-stained Chhuri at the instance of the petitioner and extra-judicial confession before Muhammad Bashir, P.W.7 and Muhammad Sharif P. W . 8.

It is stated that the extra-judicial confession is without any significance because Muhammad Bashir P.W.7 at whose dera it was made was person in authority being Chairman, Union Council and further that the evidence of last seen is also without any significance because Bashir Ahmad P.W.5 who had deposed about it is a close relation of the deceased and had merely claimed to have seen the deceased and the petitioner going together to school and there is no evidence that the deceased did not attend the school on that date. He is also a witness to the recovery of blood-stained Chhuri at the instance of the petitioner. Akbar the 'other witness who could corroborate him was not examined by the prosecution. The petitioner is a youth of the age of 14/15 years.

3. In view of the above circumstances, I am inclined to suspend his sentence and order accordingly. He shall be released on bail on his furnishing bail bonds in the sum of Rs. 20,000 with two sureties in the like amount to the satisfaction of A.C. Wazirabad.

S.A./M-233/L Bail granted.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
top advocate from Kazi Ahmed lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.