Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

BASHIR AHMAD versus THE STATE


Witnesses in the Pakistan Penal Code Section 304A rash and negligence unanimously said that the deceased was brought out from underneath the truck following a collision with the deceased, who was driving the car and was presently on the right-hand side of the deceased truck. The evidence was firmly stated that the evidence against the defendants denied the defense's evidence was anecdotal evidence against the defendants and that there was no enmity with the witnesses while driving. When the victim was targeted, he was under the influence of some intoxicating inspection of the truck which revealed that the crime was not proven. To be a crime. Enlarged on self notice

1987 M L D 1120(2)

[Lahore]

Before Ghulam Mujaddid Mirza, Actg. CJ

EHSANULLAH--Petitioner

Versus

THE STATE--Respondent

Criminal Miscellaneous. No.318/B of 1987, decided on 12th March, 1987.

Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)-

---S. 497--Bail, grant of--Ground that accused was behind bars since time of occurrence and that it was not known when trial would start- Accused admitted to bail on ground of inordinate delay in trial. Muhammad Aslam Awan for Petitioner.

Farabq Badar, A.A.-G. for the State.

ORDER

Ehsanullah son of Ismail and Mureed Hussain son of Abdullah Khan residents of Kotli Bakha, Tehsil and District Gujranwala have applied for bail after arrest. They are accused in a murder case alongwith others.

Bail application of Mureed Hussain was dismissed by me in limine as his earlier bail application was rejected on merits. It was qua Ehsanullah only that notice to the State was issued.

Learned counsel appearing on his behalf raised number of contentions. It was argued that although the allegation against him is that he was armed with Sota with which he inflicted blow on the head of the deceased nevertheless, during investigation the DSP, Narowal found him innocent. It was further submitted that this is the first time that the petitioner has moved this Court. His application was dismissed by the Additional Sessions Judge on 29-10-1985. Learned counsel submitted that the occurrence in this case is alleged to have taken place in the month of August, 1985. Since then Ehsanullah is behind the bars. Counsel laid great stress on the question of delay and submitted that it is not known when the trial is likely to conclude. Learned counsel further, submitted that there is prima facie evidence to establish that the complainant side took the law in their hands.

Bail was opposed by the A'.A.-G.

I do not want to give specific finding on all the contentions; but I think the petitioner is entitled to the concession of bail on the' ground of inordinate delay. I, therefore, admit him to bail in, the sum of Rs.50,000 with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of A.C. Gujranwala.

M.Y.H./E-2/L Bail granted.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
famous lower court advocate from Mangowal lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.