Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

MST. SAMEENA NAZ versus THE STATE


Criminal Code of Criminal Procedure (CRPC) Section 497 of the Criminal Code (XLV of 1860) Section 307/199 A woman was charged under 5 497 for not appearing at the time of the incident, Second Case CR PC Bail Approved
1987 M L D 1028

[Lahore]

Before Ijaz Nisar, J

IMDAD ALI alias SAMANDRI--Petitioner

Versus

THE STATE--Respondent

Criminal Miscellaneous No. 1152/13 of 1984, decided on 29th May, 1984.

Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)--

---S. 497/498--Penal Code (XLV of 1860) S. 302/34--Bail--Case against, accused fixed for trial--Grant of bail, held, not proper at such stage.

Ch.Muhammad Ashraf Azim for Petitioner.

Sardar Nazar Hussain Dogar for the State.

ORDER

The petitioner alongwith three others stands charged with the murder of Rashid Mahmood deceased, on 13-10-1982 at 12-45 Noon in the area of Kot Khawaja Saeed, Lahore.

2. Bail is urged on the grounds that the petitioner is under arrest for the last 18 months and the trial has not commenced as yet. The next ground is that of alibi. It is stated that the petitioner was present at Faisalabad on the relevant day in connection with a complaint case instituted by him and that his statement was also recorded on the said day.

3. Learned counsel for the State has opposed the bail. According to him the plea of alibi can be adjudged by the trial Court after recording the evidence and further that the trial has been fixed w.e.f. 19-6-1984. Learned counsel states that there is likelihood of further delay in its conclusion.

4. Since the case has been fixed for trial I do not consider it proper to allow bail at this stage. Accordingly I dismiss the application

5. However, the trial Court is directed to conclude the case before summer vacation. The petitioner may apply again for bail if the trial is not concluded by the abovementioned period.

M. Y. H. Bail refused.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
property advocates from Kot Bunglow lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.