Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

AHMAD versus NATIONAL SILK AND RAYON MILLS LTD. , LYALLPUR


The Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Section 4 and 18, before the occupation of the land in dispute, the assessment of any of the parties producing any alteration or other documentary material touching the sale of the land lying in the relevant Chak area. The sale of the land included in the purchase of land did not help the landowners in determining the market value of the land in the dispute, which was identified by the Lower Court and Land Acquisition Collector, in view of the potential of the land. Based on your decision about the price that has been followed correctly The land was acquired for one year. Before the owners of the land could be compensated, which was appropriate, appropriate and appropriate and did not require any change

1987 C L C 486

[Lahore]

Before Abaid Ullah Khan and Akhtar Hassan, JJ

AHMAD and 3 others‑‑Appellants

versus

Messrs NATIONAL SILK AND RAYON

MILLS Ltd. , LYALLPUR and another‑‑Respondents

Regular First Appeal No. 54 of 1970, decided on 3rd November, 1986.

Land Acquisition Act (I of 1894)‑‑

‑‑‑Ss. 4 & 18‑‑Compensation, assessment of‑‑None of parties producing any mutation or other documentary material touching sale of land lying in area of concerned Chak within five years prior to acquisition of land in dispute‑‑Sales of land incorporated in copies of mutations produced by land owners giving no assistance for determination of market value of land in dispute‑‑Lower Court and Land Acquisition Collector, keeping in view potential of land seemed to have acted rightly in basing their decision on price against which land lying closely had Been acquired a year before‑‑Compensation awarded to land owners, held, was just and proper and needed no alteration.

Chaudhry Aziz Ahmed for Appellants.

Nemo for Respondent No.l.

Khawaja Farooq Ahmad for Respondent No. 2.

Date of hearing: 3rd November, 1986.

JUDGMENT

ABAID ULLAH KHAN, J.‑‑

This appeal by some land‑owners and the connected Appeal No. 73 of 1969, by the National Silk and Rayon Mills Limited, Lyallpur (now Faisalabad), for which company the land in dispute measuring 13 Acres 3 Kanals 13 Marlas entered in Killas Nos. 3/2, 4 to 7, 8/2, 13/2, 14 to 17, 18/2, 23/2, 24 and 25 of Square No. 21, situate in the area of Chak No. 314/RB, tehsil and district Lyallpur (Faisalabad), was compulsorily acquired, disputing the amount of compensation awarded to the land‑owners, by the Land Acquisition Collector and affirmed by the learned Court of the Administrative Civil Judge, Lyallpur (Faisalabad), are proposed to be disposed of by this judgment. The Provincial Government issued notification of its intention to acquire the land in question under section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, on the 1st December, 1954. The Land Acquisition Collector worked out compensation at the rate of Rs.16,245 per Acre. The appellants, being dissatisfied with the award, moved the Collector for referring the matter to the Court, the land‑owners demanding enhancement and the company asking for slashing down of the amount of compensation given by the award. The learned Court, considering the compensation determined by the Collector to be appropriate, declined either to increase or reduce it. The learned Court was influenced by the fact that 142 Kanals 10 Marlas of land of Saleem Ullah and others, which lay in close proximity to the land in dispute, had been acquired a year before at the rate of Rs.13,370 per Acre and taking into account the rise in price it judged the award of compensation at the rate of Rs.16,245 to be in order. Feeling aggrieved by its decision both the parties have approached this Court in appeal.

2. The land is situate just at a distance of three and a half miles from the heart of Lyallpur (Faisalabad) city. It was surrounded by factories already set up before its acquisition. As a matter of fact the National Silk and Rayon Mills Limited required it for extension of its factory. Undoubtedly the area where the land lay was in the process of fast development and the price of the land was ever rising.

3. Unfortunately none of the parties produced any mutation or other documentary material touching sale of the land lying in the area of Chak No. 314/RB within five years prior to the acquisition of the land. The mutations, whose copies, Exhs. P. 39 to P. 60, have been brought on the record by the land‑owners, relate to sales of lands lying in other villages. Moreover, the sales incorporated in the mutations, whose copies are Exhs. P. 39, P. 42 to P. 45, P. 53 to P. 56, took place after acquisition of the land in dispute. Small pieces of land for the purpose of building houses thereon were sold through mutations whose copies are Exhs. P. 40, P. 41, P. 51 and P. 52. In such circumstances the sales of lands incorporated in the mutations whose copies have been produced by the land‑owners hardly give proper assistance for determination of the market value of the land in dispute lying in Chak No. 314/RB. The prices of sales of different lands lying in other Chaks banked upon by the National Silk and Rayon Mills Limited likewise do not furnish good guide for ascertaining the value of the land in dispute. Therefore, keeping in view the potential of the land the learned Court and the Land Acquisition Collector seem to have acted rightly in basing their decision on the price against which the land lying close by had been acquired a year before. The compensation awarded to the land‑owners is just and proper and needs no alteration. The compensation given to the land‑owners in respect of trees and Deras is by no means on the high side and demands no interference.

4. In the result the judgment of the learned trial Court is maintained and the appeals are dismissed leaving the parties to bear their own costs.

S. Q. ‑‑‑‑‑ Appeal dismissed.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
list of advocates from Kohistan lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.