Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

MAJOR (RTD.) RIASAT ALI versus FAUJI FERTILIZERS


West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance 1968 Section O12 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Termination of contract services Employees' termination of contract terms denied interference with constitutional jurisdiction

1987 P L C 673

[

Lahore

High Court]

Before Abdul Shakurul Salam, J

Major (Rtd.) RIASAT ALI

versus

FAUJI FERTILIZERS and others

Writ Petition No. 1050 of 1987, decided on 11th March, 1987.

West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance (VI of 1968)‑‑

‑‑‑S.O.12‑‑Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art. 199‑‑Termination of contractual service‑‑Services of worker terminated in terms of contract itself‑‑Interference declined in constitutional jurisdiction.

Rao Hamid Mukhtar Khan for Petitioner.

ORDER

The petitioner's services have been: terminated by the competent authority vide order dated 12‑2‑1987. Hence, this petition.

2. Clause 13(c) of the terms and conditions of service provides as follows.

"Normal service tenure would extend upto superannuation age subject to the condition that either party may terminate the service by one month's notice at any time."

The order of termination of service is that "your services are no longer required by the Fauji Fertilizer Company Limited. Your services are, therefore, terminated with immediate effect. You will be paid one month's salary in lieu of notice period."

3. From the above it is obvious that contractual service has bee terminated in terms of the contract itself. No question of invocation of Constitutional jurisdiction arises. This petition is, therefore dismissed.

M.Y.H./R‑27/L

Petition dismissed.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
how to become a advocate from Jhand lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.