Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

SH. MUHAMMAD MATIN versus MRS.SUGHRA BAI


The CPC generally amended the request for Civil Procedure Code Order VI VI, R 17 of the O VI, R 17 where modification of the application was necessary to determine the actual dispute between the parties and the nature and in this case I did not change the role, so the plaintiff's edit will not be denied. , Though it included the question of boundary [boundary]

1987 M L D 3240

[Karachi]

Before Allahdino G.Memon, J

Mst.MAQADSA BEGUM--Applicant

versus

THE STATE--Respondent

Criminal Bail Application No.1112 and Miscellaneous Application No.1643 of 1987, decided on 5th October, 1987.

(a) Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)--

---S.164--Witness--Statement of accused-applicant recorded under S.164, Cr.P.C. in the capacity of a witness, held, could not be used against accused on trial.

(b) Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)--

---Ss.498 & 164--Bail, grant of--Applicant a young girl about 17/18 years old-- Applicant's own statement recorded under S.164, Cr. P. C . as a witness, was the only piece of evidence against her and such statement also exculpatory in nature--Applicant allowed bail, in circumstances.

Sardar Muhammad Ishaq for Applicant.

S.Sarfraz Ahmed, Asstt. A.-G. for the State.

ORDER

1. Exemption allowed.

2. Mr. Sardar Muhammad Ishaq has contended that the applicant is a teenager being 17/18 of age, and she is a girl. That the only piece of evidence available against the applicant is her statement which was recorded before the Magistrate a/s 164, Cr. P. C . as a witness. It was further contended that even this statement is self- exculpatory and the applicant has not involved any person including herself.

Mr. S. Sarfraz Ahmed A.A.-G. has no objection to the gram of bail to the applicant in view of the above circumstances.

I, have considered the contentions of the learned counsel. It is an admitted position that the F.I.R. shows that the age of the applicant will be 17/18 years. She is, therefore, a young girl. That the statement made by her before a First Class Magistrate on 25-8-1987 was made in the capacity of a witness and therefore the same could not be used against her in her trial. Mr. S. Sarfraz Ahmed has also conceded to the grant of bail to the applicant.

In view of the above circumstances I direct that the applicant shall be, released on bail on furnishing surety in the sum of Rs.25,000 and PR bond in the like amount to the satisfaction of trial Court.

S.G.D./M-264/K Bail granted.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
best law firms from Kamokey lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.