RANA AMIR NADEEM ARSHAD versus NATIONAL ACCOUNTABILITY BUREAU, PUNJAB
Section 9 (a) (ix) Constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 Constitutional Appointment Bail, Applicant's Grant was arrested that members of the public were arrested on fraudulent charges and operated by a foreign exchange company. Was invested in another foreign company through them, and the owner of this foreign company had committed fraud with the applicant and many other people had applied through the applicant. Claimed he was a victim himself and filed his lawsuit against the principal accused in the lawsuit. Yes. The petitioner further requested that he be allowed by the trial court to appear as a prosecution witness against the principal accused of the National Accountability Bureau, in fact the applicant admitted his guilt even though he was responsible. There was an admission from the applicant related to the hostility that he owed to the various claimants but thus it was not enough to rule out self-help relief. The National Defense Accountability Bureau held that it was Had made it possible to prepare his money with the Principal Prosecutor, the High Court, Gambling had to consider the claim of Rs 120 million on its overall view of the defense, which was against a suspect. Their defense is not only in the pending reference against him but in the circumstances the bail was allowed to prove his claim in reference to being one of the victims of the principal accused.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2014
