Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

ZAMARRUD SABZWAR: IN RE versus ZAMARRUD SABZWAR: IN RE


Appointment of Succession Act 1925 Section 278 Administration Letters Application for the maintenance of a deceased property approved under a pre-negotiated decree by one of the heirs of the Late, in which the applicant is also appropriately updated The request was delegated, unable to handle the delivery of administration letters

1987 C L C 1112

[ Karachi]

Before Saeeduzzaman Siddiqui, J

In re: Mrs. ZAMARRUD SABZWAR‑‑Petitioner

Special Miscellaneous Appeal No. Nil of 1986, decided on 4th September, 1986.

Succession Act (XXXIX of 1925)‑‑

‑‑S. 278‑‑Grant of letters of administration‑‑Application for‑ Maintainability of‑‑Property of deceased having already been administered in terms of compromise decree passed in earlier suit instituted by one of the heirs of deceased in which petitioner was also duly represented‑ Fresh application of petitioner for grant of letters of administration, held, was not maintainable.

S. H. Rizvi for Petitioner.

Date of hearing: 4ta September, 1986.

JUDGMENT

The petitioner who is the daughter of the deceased Syed Noorul Arfin has applied for grant of letters of administration. By the present application under section 151, C.P.C., she has prayed that the heir No. 2 mentioned in the application be directed to file original documents in respect of the estates and assets of the deceased mentioned in schedule' 'B' to the application. The application is opposed and it is contended that the present proceedings for grant of letters of administration is misconceived as in respect of the same property one of the heirs of the deceased had instituted in this Court a suit for administration and accounts being suit No. 521 of 1970 in which the present petitioner was a party and that suit was disposed of in terms of a compromise arrived at between all the heirs of the deceased. The learned counsel for the petitioner does not dispute the filing of an earlier suit for administration by the heirs of the deceased and passing of a compromise decree therein. It is, however, stated by the learned counsel that as the present petitioner was a minor at the time of disposal of earlier suit she is entitled to apply for grant of letters of administration. There is nothing on record to show that the petitioner is aggrieved of or has not accepted the compromise in suit No. 521 of 1970. The property having been administered in terms of compromise decree passed in suit 521/70 instituted by one of the heirs of the deceased, in which the present petitioner was duly represented there is no further scope left for filing of any application for grant of letters of administration by any one of the heirs of the deceased. The present application as well as the main petition are accordingly dismissed.

H.B.T./Z‑2/K Application dismissed

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
immigration advocates contact from Tando Allahyar lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.