Sections 7 and 5 of the West Pakistan Family Courts Rules, 1965, R6, Determination of Institutional Jurisdiction Wives / Applicants filed suit on LL suit for marriage restitution, restitution allowance and dowry. The husband filed a case for rehabilitation. In order to obtain the minor's patronage for marital rights and Family Court, the wife's opinion was that the wife's convenience in choosing the forum was of paramount importance, and therefore, all proceedings were moved in place. According to 6 (a) the first ground for determining the territorial jurisdiction of the West Pakistan Family Courts Rules, 1965, was the cause of action, either wholly or in part, and in the case of custody or guardianship, If the minor was with the mother and was illegally removed from her residence, she would be said to be such The cause of the action on the cow is born. Otherwise, it will be considered that where the minor resided in a suit for the restoration of marital rights, in the present case, to hold LL under the rule listed in section 7 (2) of the West Pakistan Family Courts Act It must stand up. , 1964, read with R6 of the West Pakistan Family Courts, 1965, as far as the issue of guardianship is concerned, there was not enough evidence that the father had snatched the minor from the custody of the mother, therefore, in the case of the minor. I had heard of the patronage case with the father at the place where the P District Court was heard by the District P District courts. However, such a finding does not constitute proof of any credible evidence brought to the court by the wife
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2014
