Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

HABIB AHMED versus THE STATE


Section 249A & 561A Prohibition (Enforcement) Order (4 of 1979) of the Code of Criminal Procedure (4 of 1979), termination of Arts 3 and 26 before the magistrate acquits the Magistrate, Section 249A, CRP C has been accused of filing a petition. The defendant's plea pending the recording of any evidence but the case shows no evidence The record shows some witnesses demonstrating their dismissal against the accused as the Order of Magistrate ordered the action to be a premature failure. Did not receive a legal request to be revoked, the request for intervention has been dismissed in the circumstances
1987 M L D 1155

[Karachi]

Before Ajmal Mian and Syed Abdur Rehman, JJ

SHAHID HUSSAIN--Petitioner

Versus

SENIOR SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, DISTRICT EAST, KARACHI and other--Respondents

Civil Petition No. D-417 of 1987, decided on 3rd June, 1987.

Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)--

---S.154--Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art.199--Registration of First Information Report--Constitutional jurisdiction, exercise of- Allegations made by petitioner having been found to be of serious nature and prima facie disclosing cognizable offence, High Court in exercise of constitutional jurisdiction, directed Senior Superintendent of Police to cause registration of FIR of petitioner at Police Station concerned for disposal in accordance with law.

Muhammad Ismail for Petitioner.

Abdul Rahim Kazi, Addl.A.-G. for Respondents.

Date of hearing: 3rd June, 1987.

JUDGMENT

AJMAL MIAN

, J.--Office objection is overruled. This petition has been fixed for Katcha Peshi but since the notice has been served on the respondent and the Advocate-General, we dispose of the main petition as well as Misc. Application.

The petitioner through this petition has sought a direction to respondents particularly to respondent No.3 i.e. Senior Superintendent of Police, District East, Karachi to register the F.I.R. in respect of the allegation contained inter alia in paragraph 10 of the petition which reads as follows:

"10. That since the petitioner has been deprived of the sum of Rs.1,00,000 (Rupees one lacy, one Revolver of his father and four golden bangles and also Rs.20,000 have been extorted by way of illegal gratification and since the petitioner has seen the most miserable days of his life while in police custody and received bodily and mental tortures at the hands of M. A. Rind Sub-Inspector and three others and since in spite of the best efforts of the petitioner and his brother and other friends the respondent No.3 and, another functionaries of the State are not prepared to even listen to the petitioner and to take down a complaint of the petitioner and since it is the constitutional and legal right of the petitioner to get a report incorporated in the 154 Book, as laid down under Section 154 Cr.P.C. and since it is the Constitutional right of a citizen of Pakistan to get redress about the high 'handedness of the Police Department, this constitutional petition is filed on the following grounds."

Notice of this petition was issued to the learned Advocate General. In response to which Mr. Abdur Rahim Kazi, A.A.G. is present and submits the comments of respondent No.4 in which he has denied the allegations contained in the petition. He has also referred to an unreported order dated 25-8-1986 passed by a Division Bench of this Court in C.P.' No.600/1986 dismissing the petition, in limine with the observation that the petitioner should file a private complaint. The above order does not indicate what was the nature of the alleged offence in the aforesaid constitutional petition.

It may be observed that constitutional jurisdiction of the High Court is discretionary and the Court may decline to exercise the same for the reason that a petitioner has alternate adequate remedy or for any other reason if the dictates of justice so demand.

In the instant case the allegations made are of serious nature and if they are true, the same prima facie disclose a cognizable offence. The petitioner was, therefore, entitled to approach the police station concerned for getting his F.I.R. registered, which could have been disposed of by the police station concerned in accordance with law.

We, therefore, direct respondent No.3 to cause registration of F.I.R. of the petitioner at the police station concerned. The petition stands disposed of in the above terms.

H.B.T. /S-102/ K Petition accepted

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
online advocate from Jampur lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.