Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

MESSRS JOMALINA SDN. BHD. versus MESSRS SOLVEX (PAKISTAN) LTD.


Reference to Arbitration Act 1940 Section 20 Arbitration Contract Violation The contract did not find any special arbitration clause which relied on the clause of the agreement between the plaintiff and defendant which stated the submission of published rules and documents. Such a document is not found to be published by the Association of Rules but only a copy of the sample of the contract suit has been excluded

1987 M L D 316

[Karachi]

Before Muhammad Zahoorul Haq and Abdul Razzak A. Thahim, JJ

GHULAM MUHAMMAD--Petitioner

versus

COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS (PREVENTIVE), KARACHI

and another--Respondents

Constitutional Petition No.345 of 1986, decided on 26th March, 1987.

Customs Act (IV of 1969)--

---S.156(1)--Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art. 199--Constitutional jurisdiction, exercise of-- Laches--Question of ownership of foreign currency seized by Customs Authorities--Question of fact, considered by Collector Customs and by Central Board of Revenue in appeal- Order passed by authorities, not arbitrary or capricious--Petition filed after lapse of 13 months without any reasonable explanation--Huge amount of foreign currency involved--Petition, held, suffered from serious laches and was not sustainable--Dismissed in limine.

K.M. Nadeem for Petitioner.

ORDER

MUHAMMAD ZAHOORUL HAQ, J.

--This Petition arises out of three orders passed by Collector of Customs on 11-12-1983, by the Second Secretary of C.B.R. on 7-6-1984 and by the Federal Government on 19-2-1985 whereby the currency in the form of Iranian Riyals seized on 29-8-1982 from an unidentified suitcase at Karachi Airport was confiscated and the claim of the Petitioner that he was the owner of the same was rejected on the ground that he has not been able to establish his case as to the ownership of the currency.

The question whether the Petitioner was the owner of the currency or not is a question of fact and it has received consideration at the hands of the Collector in original case and at the hands of Second Secretary in appeal and there is no material before us which could establish that the orders passed by these authorities are arbitrary or capricious in any manner. Moreover, the claim of the Petitioner has also received consideration from the Central Government and the same has also been found to be untenable. They have come to the conclusion that the Petitioner had cleverly planted to own the currency in the event of its seizure by the Customs Authorities.

The amount of foreign currency involved was about eleven crore Iranian Riyals and it is reasonable for the custom authorities to conclude that a person who was the owner of such a huge amount of foreign currency could not have waited for a period of six days from 29-8-1982 to 3-9-1982 for making his claim to the said currency if he was really the owner of the same.

We are further of the view that the Petition suffers from serious laches as the final 'order was passed on 19-2-1985 whereas this petition was filed on 3-4-1986 after a period of more than 13 months without any reasonable explanation as to why all this time was allowed to lapse by the Petitioner who claim to be the owner of eleven crore Iranian Riyals.

This Petition is not found to be sustainable and is hereby dismissed in limine. Mr. Nadeem states that the Petitioner wants to establish his claim through a civil suit. Let him do so if he has really sufficient evidence to establish his claim after such a long time and in spite of the orders passed against him by custom.

S.A./G-14/K Petition dismissed.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
advocate from Mohen Jo Daro lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.