Find a Lawyer

Civil Miscellaneous No. 112‑P of 1985 in ‑Civil Appeal No. 14‑P of 1985, decided on 27th October, 1985.

‑‑‑Art. 185(3)‑‑‑Possession‑‑Application on behalf' of appellant for maintaining status quo as to possession of disputed land‑‑Respondent prima facie establishing through documents that possession had already been taken over through execution proceedings‑‑Application dismissed.

Tariq Jamal, Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioner.

A. Samad Khan, Advocate‑on‑Record for Respondent.

In the Civil Miscellaneous Petition, the learned Advocate‑on‑Record for the petitioner prays for maintaining status quo as to possession of the disputed land. But the learned Advocate‑on‑ Record for the respondent has prima facie established through documents that the possession had already been taken over through execution proceedings. Accordingly we do not see any justification to grant interim status quo. Accordingly, the C.M.P. is dismissed.

M . Y . H Petition dismissed

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.