صرف 1000 روپے میں 10 وکلاء تک کی براہِ راست رابطہ تفصیلات حاصل کریں اور کال یا واٹس ایپ کے ذریعے موزوں قانونی ماہر سے رابطہ کر کے اپنا معاملہ پورے اعتماد کے ساتھ آگے بڑھائیں۔
Civil Petition for Special Leave to Appeal No. 270‑R of 1985 and Civil Petition for Special leave to Appeal No. 269‑R of 1985, decided on 120 October, 1985.
-----Art. 185(3)‑‑‑Counsel appearing on behalf of petitioners not pressing petitions‑‑Petitions dismissed as not pressed.
Raja Muhammad Anwar, Advocate Supreme Court with Muhammad Afzal Siddiqui, Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioners.
Hanif Bhatti, Advocate Supreme Court with Khawaja Mushtaq Ahmad, Advocate‑on‑Record for Respondents.
Maulvi Sirajul Haq, Advocate Supreme Court with M. Afzal Siddiqi, Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioners.
M. Hanif Bhatti, Advocate Supreme Court with Kh. Mushtaq Ahmad, Advocate‑on‑Record for Respondents.
Date of hearing: 12th October, 1985.
The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners in both the above noted petitions does not want to press these petitions. The same are, therefore, dismissed as not pressed.
However, the petitioners are given two month, time to vacate the premises in question and hand ever vacant possession thereof to the landlords, subject to payment of advance rent every month. The petitioners are present in Court and undertake to abide by the direction of this Court.
M . Y . H . Petitions dismissed.
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer