Lawyers Directory Listing
Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.
Civil Petition No. 887 of 1985, decided on 19th October, 1985.
(On appeal from judgment and order of the Lahore High Court, Bahawalpur Bench dated 25‑6‑1985 passed in Writ Petition No. 54 of 1983 of Bahawalpur).
‑‑‑Arts. 185(3) & 199‑‑Constitutional judgments of High Court‑‑High Court in exercise of constitutional jurisdiction refusing to interfere with order of District Judge whereby request of respondent to file a fresh written statement was granted by him‑‑Order passed by High Court, held, unexceptionable‑‑Leave refused.
Irshad Ahmed Qureshi, Advocate Supreme Court with S. Inayat Hussain, Advocate‑on‑Record (absent) for Petitioners.
Nemo for Respondents.
Date of hearing: 19th October, 1985.
‑This is a petition for leave to appeal from the judgment of a learned Judge of Lahore High Court, Bahawalpur Bench, dismissing a Constitutional petition filed by petitioners. By that petition, petitioners sought to challenge the order of the District Judge, Bahawalpur dated 8‑2‑1983 allowing revision application filed by respondent No.1 herein and in result granted his request for filing a fresh written statement. The learned Judge in the High Court refused to exercise constitutional jurisdiction on the ground that on the facts disclosed learned District Judge had ample jurisdiction to permit the submission of fresh written statement.
We have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner in the light of the record before us. We find that the learned Judge in the High Court has very rightly refused to exercise the constitutional jurisdiction of the High Court on the facts of the case. There is therefore no merit in this petition and it is dismissed.
M . Y. H. Petition dismissed.
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer