Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

SHAHADAT ALI versus MUBARAK SHAH


Article 185 (3) Criminal Code of Conduct (v. 1898), Section 497 Pre-arrest Bail Before the applicant was granted bail, the applicants immediately pressed the fact that he had already been arrested for bail. A petition was filed before the trial court in which they were issued notices. The appeal against the grant of bail by the High Court requires consideration of the state claims made in the leave appeal for the leave to be granted.

1986 S C M R 172

Present: Aslam Riaz Hussain, Actg. C.J., Abdul Kadir Shaikh and S. A. Nusrat, JJ

SHAHADAT ALI‑‑Petitioner

versus

MUBARAK SHAH and another‑‑Respondents

Criminal Petition for Special Leave to Appeal No. 101‑R of 1985, decided on 20th October, 1985.

(Against the order of the High Court, Lahore, dated 8‑9‑1985, passed in Crl. Miss. No. 2122/B of 1985).

Constitution of Pakistan (1973)‑‑

‑‑‑Art. 185(3)‑‑Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898), S. 497‑‑Pre‑arrest bail‑‑Accused applying for grant of bail straightaway before High Court suppressing fact that he had already applied for pre‑arrest bail before trial Court in which notice had been issued to State‑‑Assertions made in Petition for Leave to Appeal against grant of bail by High Court requiring consideration‑‑Leave granted.

Q.M. Salim, Advocate Supreme Court and Muhammad Aslam Ch (absent) for Petitioner.

Nemo for the State.

Date of hearing: 20th October, 1985.

ORDER

ASLAM RIAZ HUSSAIN, ACTG. C.J.‑‑

The petition8seeks leave to appeal against the order of the High Court, Lahore, dated 8‑9‑1985, whereby bail before arrest was granted to the respondents.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the conduct of the respondent was such that he did not deserve the grant of bail. He urged that the respondents first, made an application for bail before arrest before Sayed Ijaz Hussain Gilani. Additional Sessions Judge. Faisalabad on 31‑8‑1985, who issued notice to the State without granting any ad' interim bail. The next date of hearing was, however, fixed on 5‑9‑1985 but the respondent instead of waiting for that date filed another bail application before arrest before a different Additional Session Judge in the same town namely Rustam Ali Malik, without informing the Court that he had already filed a similar application before Sayed Ijaz Hussain Gilani, Additional Sessions Judge, Faisalabad, and thus, got ad interim pre‑arrest bail from him upto 3‑9‑1985. On that date the respondent did not appear in the said Court with the result that his application was dismissed for non‑prosecution. He then applied for grant of bail straightaway before the High Court, suppressing the fact that he had already applied for pre‑arrest bail before Syed Ijaz Hussain Gilani, Additional Sessions Judge, Faisalabad, in which notice had been issued.

In view of these assertions which have been mentioned in the grounds of the petition, the matter needs consideration. Leave is, therefore, granted for the said purpose.

M.Y.H. Leave granted.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
famous high court advocate from Ambela lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.