Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

CH. MERAJ DIN versus LAHORE IMPROVEMENT TRUST


Article 2 (185 (al)) allowed the appeal to be examined for inter-Aliyas whether or not the fact that the Lahore Improvement Trust had initially approved the private scheme offered by the applicant. It can be given that it has no authority to approve it, neither has it been approved by the provincial government nor was there any responsibility for the formation of schemes in the future so that it can overlook its previous sanction. can do.

1986 S C M R 95

Present: Aslam Riaz Hussain, Nasim Hassan Shah and Shafiur Rahman, JJ

Ch. MERAJ DIN and others‑‑Petitioners

versus

LAHORE IMPROVEMENT TRUST‑‑Respondent

Civil Petition No. 1036 of 1981, decided on 6th May, 1985.

(Against judgment and order dated 1‑11‑1981 of Lahore High Court in R.S.A. No. 804 of 1980)

Constitution of Pakistan (1973)‑‑

‑‑‑Art. 185(3)‑‑Leave to appeal granted to examine inter alia whether after holding as a fact that Lahore Improvement Trust had at an earlier stage sanctioned private Scheme submitted by petitioner, it could be allowed to plead that it had no power to sanction it, nor had a duty to get it sanctioned from Provincial Government and in framing Schemes in future it could altogether ignore its earlier sanction.

Ch. Khalil‑ur‑Rehman, Senior Advocate Supreme Court instructed by S. Wajid Hussain, Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioners.

Farooq Zaman, Advocate Supreme Court and Hamid Aslam Qureshi Advocate‑on‑Record for Respondent.

Date of hearing: 6th May, 1985.

ORDER

SHAFIUR RAHMAN, J.‑‑

Leave to appeal is granted to the petitioner to examine, inter alia whether after holding as a fact that the Lahore Improvement Trust had at an earlier stage sanctioned the Private Scheme submitted by the petitioner (issue No.2), it could be allowed to plead that it had no power to sanction it, nor had a duty to get it sanctioned from Provincial Government and in framing Scheme in future it could altogether ignore its earlier sanction.

Security Rs.2,500.

The petitioner shall be responsible for getting the appeal ready and complete in all respects for hearing within two months from today.

The extent to which the plaintiff owned the land on the date of notification shall meanwhile stand excluded from implementation of the impugned Scheme. For getting the exact area so excluded determined the petitioner shall approach and satisfy the respondent.

The record of the trial Court be called for and made available at the hearing.

M. Y. H. Leave granted.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
lawer from fb area from Kotli Loharan lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.