Section 497 Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Section 302/324/148/149 Qutel AMD, riot with deadly weapons, illegal assembly bail, accused's refusal to fire on the complaining party, resulting in four. The men suffered firearms injuries and it also killed that the accused's first bail plea was withdrawn before the High Court departed, while the second case was dismissed because of non-prosecution. Third, a request for bail was filed on the basis of the fact that the complaining party was also sought as an accused in a private complaint. Yes, and after more than two years, the trial was not over, all the injured witnesses, except the accuracy, joined the investigation and their statements under Section 161 were fully verified in the FIR. , One of the PCP injured witnesses laid the burden of the crime on the complaining party and the vate complaint was filed more than a year after the alleged incident that led to the cross-case being made through a private complaint. And by that time the prosecution's witnesses had withdrawn from their earlier statements and changed their loyalties. Applying for an existing bail application with private bail was hardly possible. The complainant, the prosecution witness and the eyewitness testified as the accused continued to appear in the trial court but could not be registered because of the defendant's stubbornness. Not checked by. In the circumstances the request was rejected
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2014
