Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

KHAN MUHAMMAD versus STATE


Article 185 (3) Criminal Code of Conduct (V9 1898), Section 498 Criminal Code (XLV of 1860), Section 354A / 34 Guarantee, Guarantees of the accused under Section 451A / 34, PPC under High Court revocation. Article 185 (3) Criminal Code of Conduct (V9 1898), section 498 of the Code of Conduct (XLV of 1860), Article 185 (3) refused to interfere with the leave of appeal for appeal. 354 A / 34 Bail, the High Court, while canceling the bail of the accused under Section 451A / 34, PPC, has asked the Supreme Court for leave to appeal for any violation of law or law. Deposit refused to intervene. Cancellation of bail of the accused under Section 454 A / 34, PPC, Section 354 A / 34 bail of the Conduct Rule (XLV of 1860), the Supreme Court refused to interfere with the leave application for appeal. ? Dismiss
1986 S C M R 2017

Present: Muhammad Afzal Zullah and Abdul Qadir Shaikh, JJ

KHAN MUHAMMAD‑‑Petitioner

versus

THE STATE‑‑Respondent

Criminal Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 432 of 1985, decided on 19th November, 1985.

Constitution of Pakistan (1973)‑-

‑‑‑Art. 185(3)‑‑Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898), S. 498‑‑Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S. 354‑A/34‑‑Bail, cancellation of‑‑High Court cancelling bail of accused under S. 451‑A/34, P.P.C. ‑No violation of any provision or principle of law‑‑Supreme Court declined to interfere‑ Petition for leave to appeal dismissed.

Muhammad Rafiq Khan Chohan, Advocate Supreme Court and S. Inayat Hussain, Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioner.

Nemo for the State.

Date of hearing: 19th November, 1985.

JUDGMENT

ABDUL QADIR SHAIKH, J.‑‑

This is a 'petition for leave to appeal from the order of a learned Judge of Lahore High Court, dated 12‑10‑1985 cancelling petitioner's bail which was granted to him by the Sessions Judge, Khushab. Petitioner is an accused along with three others in a case under section 354‑A read with section 34, P.P.C. which is awaiting trial.

After having heard the learn' counsel for the petitioner in the light of the record before us, we find that by cancelling petitioner's bail learned Judge has not violated any provision or principle of law. There is, therefore, no valid justification for this Court to interfere.

The petition is dismissed.

M.I. Petition dismissed.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
power of attorney advocate Mohen Jo Daro lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.