Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

PARVEEN AKHTAR versus MUHAMMAD ASHRAF


Article 185 (3) Guardian and Wards Act (VII of 1890), Article 17 and 25 The custody of minors given to the father by the Guardian Judge mother
1986 S C M R 1944

Present: Karam Elahee Chauhan and M.S.H. Quraishi, JJ

Mst. PARVEEN AKHTAR‑‑Petitioner

versus

MUHAMMAD ASHRAF‑‑Respondent

Civil Petition for Special Leave to Appeal No. 1082 of 1979, decided on 12th August, 1981.

(On appeal from the judgment and order of the Lahore High Court, dated 29th October, 1979, in F.A.0. No. 120 of 1978).

Constitution of Pakistan (1973)‑‑

‑‑‑Art. 185(3)‑‑Guardians and Wards Act (VIII of 1890), Ss.17 & 25‑ Custody of minor children given to father by Guardian Judge‑‑Mother re‑marrying a stranger‑‑Petition for leave to appeal by mother dismissed.

A.W. Butt, Advocate Supreme Court (absent) and Sh. Abdul Karim, Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioner.

Nemo for Respondent.

Date of hearing: 12th August, 1981.

ORDER

KARAM ELAHEE CHUHAN,J.‑‑

This case involves the question of the custody of three children viz. (i) Naeem Akhtar, (ii) Muhammad Masoom Ashraf, and (iii) Mst.Shabana Noureen. The learned Guardian Judge vide his order, dated 18‑3‑1978 gave the custody of (ii) and (iii) to their father Muhammad Ashraf (respondent), and dismissed the application qua No.1 as he had become major.

2. The petitioner (mother of the children) filed an appeal being F.A.0. No.1.20 of 1978 which was dismissed by the High Court on 29‑10‑1979.

3. The petitioner has now come up in a petition for special leave to appeal against the same to this Court.

4. We have heard the learned counsel. We were told that Naeem Akhtar had attained majority and, therefore, no question regarding his custody in any manner is in issue. However, the case was pressed for the other two minor children. It may be mentioned that mother of the children has married a stranger, therefore, in these circumstances, we do not think that this is a fit case for grant of leave to appeal by this Court. Judgments of the Courts below are supported by sound reasons and the learned counsel has not been able to point out any infirmity therein.

5. The result is that this petition has no merit and is dismissed.

M . I . Petition dismissed.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
immigration advocates phone number from Fort Abbas lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.