Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

GUL SHER versus STATE


Article 185 (3) Criminal Code of Conduct (V9 1898), Section 497 Sentencing Code (XLV of 1860), Section 302 Bail, approval of the next inquiry matter which has been killed by arms No specific role has been assigned to the applicants. Which was due to any addiction. One of the co-accused is not applying for bail and the other fugitive applicant is not causing death from a two-pronged weapon. The matter is further investigated, the appeal is changed to appeal and granted
1986 S C M R 1862

Present: Muhammad Haleem, C. J. S. A. Nusrat and Zaffar Hussain Mirza, JJ

GUL SHER and another‑‑Petitioners

versus

THE STATE‑‑Respondent

Criminal Petition No. 62‑K of 1986, decided on 11th August, 1986.

(On appeal from the judgment and order of the High Court of Sind at Karachi, dated 22‑6‑1986 passed in Criminal Bail Application No. 321/765 of 1986)

Constitution of Pakistan (1973)‑‑

‑‑‑Art. 185(3)‑‑Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898), S. 497‑‑Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S. 302‑‑Bail, grant of‑‑Case of further enquiry‑ Deceased killed by fire‑arms‑‑No specific role assigned to petitioners for having caused any Lathi blow‑‑Blunt weapon injury not contributing towards death‑‑One co‑accused not applying for bail and other absconding‑‑Petitioners' case being of further enquiry, petition converted into appeal and allowed.

Nooruddin Sarki, Advocate Supreme Court instructed by Rashid Akhter Qureshi, Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioners.

A. Sattar Shaikh, Additional Advocate‑General instructed by Abdul Saeed Khan, Advocate‑on‑Record for the State.

Date of hearing: 11th August, 1986.

ORDER

MUHAMMAD HALEEM, C.J.‑‑

The case appears to us to be one of further inquiry as the incident took place at the bus stand and no specific role has been assigned to either of the two petitioners for having caused any Lathi blow to deceased Mitho, one of the two deceased who were killed by fire‑arms by Ali Hassan and Isso. The former has not applied for bail and the latter has absconded. The medical evidence shows that this blunt weapon injury has not contributed in any manner towards his death. Accordingly we would convert this petition into appeal and allow it as we consider it a fit case for the grant of bail to the petitioners. Each one of them shall furnish a bail bond in the sum of Rs.20,000 with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Sessions Judge, Hyderabad.

M. I. Appeal allowed.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
criminal advocate from Fort Abbas lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.