Lawyers Directory Listing
Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.
(On appeal from the judgment and order of the Federal Service Tribunal, Karachi, dated 27‑11‑1984 passed in Appeal No. 70(K) of 1984).
(On appeal from the judgments and orders of the federal Service Tribunal, Karachi, dated 5‑5‑1985, 10‑10‑1985 and 13‑10‑1985 passed in Appeals ‑Nos.97(K) of 1984, 115‑116/1985 and 36(K) of 1985).
(On appeal from the judgment and order of the Federal Service Tribunal, Karachi, 22‑4‑1984, 1‑6‑1982, 14‑11‑1882, 27‑10‑1983, 5‑1‑1986, 8‑12‑1985 passed in Appeals Nos. 26(K), 55(K), 97(K) of 1982, 68(K) of 1983, 139(K) and 139(K) of 1985).
‑‑‑Art. 212(3)‑‑Federal Service Tribunals Act (LXX of 1973), S.4‑ Petition for leave to appeal‑‑Appeals of petitioners were dismissed by Federal Service Tribunal as being hopelessly time‑barred and petitioners failed to furnish any satisfactory explanation for condonation of delay‑ Findings of Tribunals being unexceptionable, leave to appeal refused.
Federation of Pakistan v. Riaz Ahmad Baig and others 1984 SCMR 759 ref.
Petitioners in Person (in all Petitions).
Nemo for Respondents.
Date of hearing: 25th August, 1986.
All the above petitions were dismissed by) the learned Federal Service Tribunal as‑ per impugned judgment as being hopelessly time‑barred and the petitioners having failed to furnish any satisfactory explanation for the condonation of delay. Such findings of the learned Tribunal are unexceptionable. The petitions are, therefore, dismissed.
2. However, the petitioners have, by way of alternative, showed their willingness to accept the offer of the Government contained it: paragraph 8 of our judgment passed in Civil Appeal No. 140 of 1984 and Civil Petition No. 121‑R of 1983 (and 367 other petitions) decided on 29‑2‑1984, reported as Federation of Pakistan v . Riaz Ahmad Baig and others 1.984 S C M R 759. Though the option now made by the petitioners is somewhat delayed, we expect that it shall be considered by the Government on its own merits.
M. Y. H.
Leave refused.
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer